Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
However, at the time of hearing before us, it was pointed out by the learned counsel that the learned CIT(A) had allowed only part relief and, therefore, against the addition sustained at `3,45,914/-, the assessee had filed appeal before the ITAT. The ITAT, in its order dated 5th May, 2011 in ITA No.3142/Del/2010, set aside the entire matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for deciding the issue afresh. Since the entire addition of `12,85,000/- has been set aside by the ITAT to the file of the Assessing Officer, this appeal by the Revenue does not survive.
Citation :
ITA No.3470/Del/2010 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Rohtak.(Appellant) Vs. Shri Virender Bansal, S/o Shri Bhagwan Dass, R/o HUDA Complex, Civil Road, Rohtak. PAN: AAMPB5283A. (Respondent)
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
