ICICI

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Explanation of cash deposit during demonetization period


Court :
ITAT Delhi

Brief :
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 05.03.2021 pertaining to A.Y. 2017-18.

Citation :
ITA No.481/Del/2021

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
BEFORE SH. N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
ITA No.481/Del/2021
Assessment Year: 2017-18

Puneet Utreja
B-1/6, Rana Pratap Bagh,
New Delhi-110007
PAN No.ABEPU1160G

vs

Puneet Utreja
B-1/6, Rana Pratap Bagh,
New Delhi-110007
PAN No.ABEPU1160G

Appellant by Sh. Prakash Mishra, CA
Respondent by Sh. Vipul Kashyap, Sr DR
Date of hearing: 30/09/2021
Date of Pronouncement: 04/10/2021
ORDER

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 05.03.2021 pertaining to A.Y. 2017-18.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the return of income filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment. The reason for the selection of the return for scrutiny assessment was “Cash deposit during demonetization period”.

3. Before me the counsel could not adduce any evidence to dislodge the findings of NFAC on the contrary reiterated what was stated before NFAC. In absence of any documentary evidence brought on record in support of claims made for explaining the source of cash deposit I do not find any reason to interfere with the findings of the NFAC.

4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 04.10.2021.
Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement

 

Poojitha Raam
on 18 October 2021
Published in Income Tax
Views : 33
downloaded 16 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags