Court :
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Brief :
In paragraph 2 of the judgment, it was pointed out by this Court that the learned counsel for the assessee/appellant confined his grievance only to disallowance of payment of `2,00,000/- made to one Mr. Sunil Kumar. This issue has been considered and decided in favour of the appellant/assessee holding that there was sufficient evidence to prove the expenditure of `2,00,000/- by the assessee
Citation :
RAHULJEE & COMPANY PVT. LTD. . . . APPELLANT/REVIEW PETITIONER Through: Mr. P.L. Juneja, Advocate. VERSUS INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL-I & OTHERS . . . RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel.
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
SMJ global advisors pvt ltd
New Delhi
B.Com
View Details
Shaswat initial support private limited
Ahmedabad
CS
View Details
Sri Aurobindo Gnostic Centre of Education
New Delhi
CA
View Details
CAclubindia
