Does business of providing high speed wireless internet access fall under the ambit of TDS Section 194C or 194J?


Last updated: 14 August 2021

Court :
ITAT Chennai

Brief :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem dated 25.06.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2017-18.

Citation :
ITA No.: 2842/CHNY/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI

BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.: 2842/CHNY/2019

Assessment Year: 2017-18

M/s. Infonet Comm
Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.,
468/10, Balaji Nagar,
Tiruchengode Road,
Namakkal – 637 003.
PAN: AACCM 8749D

Appellant

vs

The Income Tax Officer,
TDS Ward,
Salem.

Respondent

Appellant by : Shri T.S. Lakshmi Narayanan, FCA

Respondent by : Shri G. Suresh Periasamy, JCIT

Date of Hearing : 19.07.2021

Date of Pronouncement : 28.07.2021

O R D E R

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem
dated 25.06.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2017-18.

2.The ld.AR for the assessee at the time of hearing submitted that there is a delay of 1 day in filing appeal before
the Tribunal for which necessary petition for condonation of appeal along with affidavit has been filed explaining the reason for delay in filing the appeal.

3.The brief facts of the case are that the assessee M/s.Infonet Comm Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the
business of service provider for bandwidth communication sold by M/s. Bharthi Airtel Ltd and M/s. Reliance Communications Ltd.

4. The ld.AR for the assessee submitted that the ld.CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the action of the AO to compute short
deduction of TDS and related interest u/s.201(1) & 201(1A) of the Act, without appreciating the fact that the assessee company is engaged in the business of providing high speed wireless internet access to its customers without any human intervention and hence, said services cannot be called as fees for technical services, as defined u/s.9(1) of the Act, which attracts provisions of section 194J of the Act.

5. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete additions made towards short deduction of TDS and interest u/s.201(1) / 201(1A) of the Act.

6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the court on 28th July, 2021 at Chennai.

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement

 

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details