Demand of service tax cannot be raised when the tax liability has already been discharged under RCM


Last updated: 04 December 2024

Court :
CESTAT, Ahmedabad

Brief :
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of Utility Labour Suppliers v. Commissioner of C.E.-Ahmedabad-II [Service Tax Appeal No. 10780 of 2022-DB dated November 26, 2024] held that demand of service tax cannot be raised when the tax liability has already been discharged under RCM.

Citation :
Service Tax Appeal No. 10780 of 2022-DB dated November 26, 2024

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of Utility Labour Suppliers v. Commissioner of C.E.-Ahmedabad-II [Service Tax Appeal No. 10780 of 2022-DB dated November 26, 2024] held that demand of service tax cannot be raised when the tax liability has already been discharged under RCM.

Facts:

Utility Labour Suppliers ("the Appellant") was issued a Show Cause Notice dated April 23, 2021 ("the SCN") wherein the demand of Service Tax has been proposed along with interest and penalty, alleging that the total sales of services as declared in ITR/Form 26AS was not equivalent to gross value of services as declared in ST-3 returns, and the amount of the demand was proposed of the differential amount. The said demand was affirmed in the Order-in-Original dated July 04, 2022 ("the Impugned Order").

Aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Appellant filed an appeal before the tribunal.

Issue:

Whether demand of service tax can be raised when the tax liability has already been discharged under RCM?

Held:

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of Service Tax Appeal No. 10780 of 2022-DB held as under:

  • Observed that, as per Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated June 20, 2012 as amended vide Notification No. 7/2015 -ST dated March 1, 2015, the Recipient of Manpower Supply Service, is liable to pay service tax from the aforesaid date. Earlier, Service provider on the said service was liable to pay 25 percent service tax on the service supplied and rest of the service tax liability was discharged by the Recipient
  • Noted that, the Pharma Company being recipient of service, discharged whole tax liability considering it as activity of labour/manpower supply.
  • Opined that, the Department has erred in issuing the order on account of fact that the service tax liability has already been discharged and the demand of service tax from the Appellant would lead to double taxation.
  • Held that, the Impugned Order is set aside.

OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY HAS BEEN ATTACHED

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 204
downloaded 186 times

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 July 2026
CA Articles

Kinjal H Shah & Co.

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT , CA SemiQualifie

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 July 2026
Article internship

AJAY SINGH AND CO LLP

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 July 2026
Articleship

Jawahar and Associates Chartered Accountants

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details