Court :
ITAT Chennai
Brief :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Chennai, dated 17.11.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2010-11.
Citation :
ITA 1184/CHNY/2018
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
BEFORE SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.: 1184/CHNY/2018
Assessment Year: 2010-11
M/s. FIH India Private
Limited,
(formerly Foxconn India
Private Limited)
SIPCIT Hi-Tech SEZ, SIPCOT
Industrial Park, Phase-II, (NH-4)
Sunguvarchatram – 602 106
Sriperumbudur Taluk,
Kanchipuram District.
PAN: AAACF9390F
Appellant
vs.
The DCIT,
Company Circle – 2(1),
Chennai.
Respondent
Appellant by : Shri S.P. Chidambaram, Advocate
Respondent by : Shri Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Date of Hearing : 20.01.2021
Date of Pronouncement : 08.02.2021
O R D E R
Per G. MANJUNATHA, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Chennai, dated 17.11.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2010-11.
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT (A)”] is contrary to law, facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Disallowance of service tax written off
2.1 The CIT (A) erred in confirming the disallowance made by the AO for the refund of input service tax written off amounting to Rs.51,65,869.
2.2 The CIT (A) failed to appreciate that the Appellant is operating in Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and as such it is exempt from service tax.
2.3 The CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that since the Appellant is not liable to service tax, the Appellant is eligible to claim the input service tax charged by the suppliers as refund from the Service Tax department.
To know more in details find the attachment file
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CAclubindia
