Can Corporate Management Fee be added u/s 40(a)(i) in the income computation statement?

Last updated: 28 August 2021

Save Share

Quick Summary

This judgement concerns whether a corporate management fee can be added back under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act when computing income. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found that the revision order by the CIT(LTU) was not legally sustainable. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the revision order was set aside.

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the revision order dated 19.1.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(LTU), Bangalore for assessment year 2010-11 u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short]. The assessee is challenging the validity of same.

Citation :
ITA No.654/Bang/2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“C’’BENCH: BANGALORE
BEFORE SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND
SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ITA No.654/Bang/2017
Assessment Year: 2010-11

3M India Limited
Concorde Block, UB City
24, Vittal Mallya Road
Bengaluru 560 001
PAN NO :AAACB5724H

APPELLANT

CIT (LTU)
Bangalore

RESPONDENT

Appellant by : Shri Sharath Rao, A.R.
Respondent by : Shri Pradeep Kumar, D.R.
Date of Hearing : 11.08.2021
Date of Pronouncement : 24.08.2021
O R D E R

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the revision order dated 19.1.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(LTU), Bangalore for assessment year 2010-11 u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short]. The assessee is challenging the validity of same.

2. The Ld. CIT initiated revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act, after examining the assessment record and coming to the conclusion that the assessment order passed is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest on the revenue.

3. The TPO determined ALP of Corporate Management services at NIL. However, while computing the Transfer Pricing adjustment, he reduced the amount of Rs.2.80 crores voluntarily disallowed u/s 40(a). Accordingly, the transfer pricing adjustment was made for the balance amount only.

4. It is the case of the Ld CIT that, in AY 2009-10 no separate addition due to TP adjustment was made in respect of Rs.2.80 crores (even though the TPO had determined the ALP at NIL), since the assessee had voluntarily disallowed the same u/s 40(a) of the Act. Accordingly, it is the case of the Ld CIT that the disallowance should be considered to have been made u/s 92CA also.

5. In view of the foregoing discussions, we are of the view that the impugned revision order is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, we set aside the same.

6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 24th Aug, 2021

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement

FAQ :

The main issue is whether a corporate management fee can be added back under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act during income computation.

The CIT (LTU) initiated revision proceedings, believing the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, suggesting the disallowance should be considered under Section 92CA as well.

The TPO determined the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the Corporate Management services at NIL.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found the revision order unsustainable in law and set it aside, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.

Attached File : 1442821_4296_1629803416_ita_654_of_2017_3m_india_limited_bangalore.pdf

downloaded 237 times

185 Views Comment Share Income Tax Report

Judgement posted by

Poojitha Raam Vinay

Practice

I simplify complex income tax, TDS, banking, and investment updates into practical insights for taxpayers, salaried professionals, pensioners, and senior citizens. I regularly write on ITR filing, tax compliance, savings schemes, and the latest financial rule changes in India.

View Judgements

Comments