Judgements by Bimal Jain

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in Mr. Anil Dudalal Kaneria v. C.C.E.-Bharuch [Excise Appeal No.10079 of 2019] has held that a huge personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company who is not looking after the accounts of the goods manufacture

The Delhi, CESTAT in M/s Seher v. Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi [Service Tax Appeal No. 52708 of 2016dated June 13, 2022] held that, service tax is not payable on reimbursement of expensesas the nature of service should make no difference to the

The AAR, Maharashtra in the matter of Gulf Turbo Solutions LLP [Advance Ruling No. GST- ARA- 101/2019-20/B-53 dated April 27, 2022]has held that assessee providing marketing services to a foreign company and acting as a conduit between a foreign comp

The Hon'ble Gauhati High Court in Century Plyboards (India) Ltd. &Anr. v. the Union of India & Ors. [WP(C) 3210 of 2022 dated May 18, 2022] held that the Managing Director ("MD") of a company should not be directly summoned by authorities under Secti

The Hon'ble Kerala High Court in M/s G & C Infra Innovations v. Union of India and Ors. [WP(C) No. 14096 of 2019 dated March 7, 2022] has directed the Revenue Department to facilitate revising of Form GST TRAN-1 to the assessee and make necessary arr

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Munjaal Manishbhai Bhatt v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 1350 of 2021 dated May 06,2022] has quashed and set aside the order passed by the AAAR, providing for mandatory deeming fiction for deductio

The AAR, Karnataka in the matter of M/s Keysight Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., [Advance Ruling No. KAR/ADRG/11 of 2022 dated April 21, 2022] held that, supply of license of pre-developed or pre-designed software by assessee amounts to supply of goods

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in Phillips Carbon Black Limited v. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-(ii) [Excise Appeal No. 10243 of 2019 dated April 29, 2022] set aside the order denying the CENVAT Credit to the assessee in respect of outward Goods Transport Agent ("G

The Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in M/s. Godavari Commodities Ltd. vs. The State of Jharkhand [W.P.(T) No. 3908 of 2020 dated April 18, 2022], held that the Adjudication Order is non est in the eye of law, as the same has been passed wit

The CESTAT, Delhi in M/s Rajasthan Rajya VidhyutPrasaran Nigam Ltd. v. Commissioner of CGST, Customs [Service Tax Appeal No. 53020 of 2018 dated January 01, 2022] set aside the order passed by the Revenue Department confirming demand of service tax o