Judgements by Bimal Jain

The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Private Limited v. Excise and Taxation Commissioner and Ors. [CWP-5822-2023, order dated February 06, 2026]  held that rejection of the petitioner's re

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in M/s Rollmet LLP & Ors v. Union of India & Ors [WP No. 16848 of 2025 & connected matters dated April 17, 2026] examined a batch of writ petitions challenging the legality of single consolidated show-cause notices issue

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Rohitkumar Parsotambhai Sanghani v. State of Gujarat &Anr. [R/Criminal Misc. Application No. 2111 of 2026, order dated March 3, 2026] held that an Advocate accused in a GST input tax credit (ITC) fraud ca

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s Tenet Networks Private Ltd v. GST Council and Others [Writ Tax No. 361 of 2024, order dated February 25, 2026] held that where the appellate authority rejected the appeal on the ground of limitation

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Emerson Process Management (India) Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors. [R/Special Civil Application No. 7006 of 2024, order dated March 5, 2026] held that transfer of Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) on amalgamation

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Modern Traders v. Deputy Commissioner/Joint Commissioner, Nagpur - II & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 4344 of 2025, order dated February 20, 2026] held that where a taxpayer alleges that tax was deposited during

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s Sanjay Construction through Authorized Representative Shivendra Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh &Anr. [Writ Tax No. 161 of 2026, order dated February 17, 2026] held that interest liability cannot be

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of SachdeRoadlines v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 2515 of 2026 order dated February 26, 2026] quashed the proceedings as all the notices, show cause notice, and orders were sent to the ol

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Tuesonpower International (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition (L) NO. 40917 of 2025 order dated February 12, 2026] permitted the video recording during summon inquiry under Section 70 of the Central