Judgements by Bimal Jain

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Association of Technical Textiles Manufacturers and Processors &Anr. V. Union of India & ors. [W.P.(C) 5933/2019 dated November 16, 2023] held that, the respondents could not draw attention to any provision

The CESTAT, Allahabad in the case of M/s. Mahesh & Co. Pte Ltd. Singapore v. Commissioner of Customs Noida[Customs Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2022 dated November 9, 2023], imposed a penalty of Rs.2,00,000/- for causing delay in implementation of

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Clear Secured Services Private Limited v. Commissioner, State Tax GST UP, [Writ Tax No. 5 of 2023 dated November 23, 2023] allowed the writ petition and reduced the amount of penalty from Rs.56,00,952.7

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s.VAB Apparel LLP v. Commissioner, Delhi GST and Ors [W.P.(C) 13642/2023 dated November 10, 2023] held that without specifying any particular reason and explanation for the cancellation of GST Registratio

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. Shewil Trading Company v. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors. [W.P. No. 26493 of 2022 dated November 02, 2023] directed the Cyber Crime Cell Inspector to complete the investigation within eigh

The Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case M/s. Mathew Scaria v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax and Ors. [WP(C) 33099 of 2023 dated October 16, 2023] disposed of the writ petition, thereby directing the Revenue Department to dispose Stay Application

The Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of M/s.Deepak Sales Corporation v. Union of India [CWP No. 283 of 2023 dated September 21, 2023] allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee by way of the writ petition and held that, the demand of interest

The CESTAT, Kolkata in M/s. Piyush Sharma v. Commissioner of CGST & CX, Patna-I [Service Tax Appeal No.75856 of 2021 dated October 17, 2023] held that service tax demand based on Form 26 AS from the Income Tax Department without Investigation is Inva

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court in the case of Aditya Medisales Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand[W.P. (T) NO. 4338 OF 2022 dated October 9, 2023] held that the initiation of proceedings is bad in law, in as much as, in this case, only a summary of show ca

Aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Appellant filed Civil Appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India [Civil Appeal No. 2406-2407 of 2022] which has been admitted vide Order dated November 3, 2023.