Income Tax Judgements

These appeals have been preferred against the order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana where the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants for compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act) on

There is no liability on NRIs for payment of advance tax. It is duty of person crediting payment into account of NRIs to deduct tax u/s. 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Refund should not be withheld due to some reason of technical glitch, system fails, mismatch of TDS etc. The Concerned AO must manually calculate the refund and release the refund. The computer system and auto-generation or any difficulty in doing so

In this case the refund to the assessee was due to order of CIT(A) and not the basis of regular assessment and hence interest under Section 234D is not leviable.

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Basanta Kumar Shaw v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Commercial Taxes and State Tax, [MAT 976 OF 2022 WITH CAN 1 OF 2022] held that in terms of Rule 86A(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s BBM Impex Pvt. Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) [Customs Early Hearing Application No.50414 of 2022 with Customs Appeal No. 51662 of 2022-SM] has held that, the appellant is entitled

Payment made by the assessee to non-resident marketing partners for providing pre- and post-sale services related to software solutions is in the nature of Fees for Technical Services.

The proceedings under Arbitration & Reconciliation Act, 1996 and SARFAESI Act, 2002 can go hand in hand and matters on which SARFAESI Act,2002 are applicable can be referred to the Arbitration. The court further held that the provisions of SARFAESI A

Property sold by Secured Creditor in an Auction Sale under SARFAEsi Act, 2022 -held valid( Supreme Court)

Statutory Right of third party to be compensated U/S 149 MV Act, evenif vehicle owner contests Claim.