Bogus bills issued by M/s Asian Tube Trading


Last updated: 28 August 2021

Court :
ITAT Amritsar

Brief :
Whether worthy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has not erred in law in not taking cognizance of assessee's own admission that M/s Asian Tube Trading is a fictitious firm of his parent Firm Mis Na yak Steel.

Citation :
ITA Nos.589/Asr/2014& C.O. 52/Asr/2016

In the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Amritsar Bench, Amritsar
Before : Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member And
Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Accountant Member
ITA Nos.589/Asr/2014& C.O. 52/Asr/2016
Assessment Year2010-11

ACIT,
Amritsar
(Appellant)

vs

M/s. Bishan Steel, Industries
Top floor, Bishan House,
Kamla Nagar Market
Deori, Amritsar
PAN: AAAFB9250F
(Respondent)

Appellant by Sh. Charan Das, DR
Respondent by Sh. Tarun Badal, Adv.

Date of Hearing 14.07.2021
Date of Pronouncement 24.08.2021

ORDER

Whether worthy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has not erred in law in not taking cognizance of assessee's own admission that M/s Asian Tube Trading is a fictitious firm of his parent Firm Mis Na yak Steel.

2. Whether worthy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) was right in ignoring the material facts of the case that there was difference in the quality and quantity of goods purchased and goods sold by the assessee which is contrary to the assessee's claim that he had directly sold the goods without taking delivery itself.

3. Asian Tube Trading, Mumbai subject to maintenance of same paint quality a+icn clearly proves that M/s. Asian Tube Trading, Mumbai was part of M/s. Nyka Steels Pvt. Ltd. In similar circumstances Jurisdictional High Court has held in the case of CIT vs. Leaders Valves Pvt. Ltd 285 ITR 435 that as consumption stood fully proved the existence of parties can not be denied. In this case it was also held that if purchases are treated as bogus it would be impossible to manufacture the goods shown to have been manufactured. Similarly in the present case it would be impossible to have such quantitative sale and profits in absence of such purchases.

4. In the result the appeal of the revenue as well as CO of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement
 

 

Poojitha Raam Vinay pro badge
Published in Income Tax
Views : 124
Attached File : 1442821_4291_27.pdf
downloaded 263 times

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT

BHUPINDER SHAH AND COMPANY

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Finance Manager- Chartered Accountant

Triveni Turbine Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Winshine Financial Services

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

ANV & Company

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant - GST & Direct Tax

APL

Mumbai

CA

View Details