Balvinder Kumar Nanda, Delhi Pr, CIT-16, New Delhi

Last updated: 21 December 2020

Save Share

Quick Summary

This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi case involves an appeal by Balvinder Kumar Nanda against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT-16) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee, engaged in the electronics components business, had declared a total income of Rs. 5,07,98,490/-. Following a limited scrutiny regarding an increase in capital, the Assessing Officer found no discrepancies and assessed the income as returned. The PCIT subsequently issued an order under Section 263, which the assessee is now appealing.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
Aggrieved by the order dated 20/12/2019 under section 263 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) passed by the principalCommissioner of Income Tax-16, New Delhi (“Ld. PCIT”) in the case of Sh. Balvinder Kumar Nanda (“the assessee”) for the assessment year 2015-16, the assessee filed this appeal.

Citation :
ITA No.-485/Del/2020

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
&
SHRI K.N. CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No.-485/Del/2020
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)

Balvinder Kumar
686, Old Lajpat Rai Market,
Delhi.
PAN No. AABPN9884E
Appellant

Vs.

Pr. CIT-16
Drum Shape Building,
I.P. Estate,
New Delhi.
Respondent

Assessee by Shri Rakesh Gupta, Adv.
Revenue by ShrinSatpal Gulati, CIT DR

Date of hearing: 02.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 10.12.2020

ORDER

PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JM

Aggrieved by the order dated 20/12/2019 under section 263 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) passed by the principalCommissioner of Income Tax-16, New Delhi (“Ld. PCIT”) in the case of Sh. Balvinder Kumar Nanda (“the assessee”) for the assessment year 2015-16, the assessee filed this appeal.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and engagedin the business of purchasing the sales of electronics components. He has filedhis return of income on 18.08.2015, declaring total income of Rs. 5,07,98,490/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act, and thereafter, it was selectedfor limited scrutiny through CASS on the issue of “increase in capital". Notice u/s143(2) of the Act was issued on 19.09.2016, assessee entered appearance andduring the course of hearing, the assessee was required to explain substantial increase in the capital account. Requisite details were filed by the assessee.Vide order dated 16/8/2017, as could be seen from the impugned order, theincome of the assessee was assessed at a total income of Rs. 5,07,98.490/- asshown in the returned income, observing that no discrepancy was found on the issue under consideration.

To know more in details find the attachment file

FAQ :

The case concerns an appeal filed by Balvinder Kumar Nanda against an order made by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-16 under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2015-16.

The assessee, Balvinder Kumar Nanda, is in the business of purchasing and selling electronics components. He declared a total income of Rs. 5,07,98,490/- for the assessment year 2015-16.

The assessee's return was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS specifically on the issue of 'increase in capital'.

Following the scrutiny and review of details provided by the assessee, the Assessing Officer found no discrepancies regarding the increase in capital and assessed the income at the returned figure of Rs. 5,07,98,490/-.

The current appeal was filed by the assessee after the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-16 passed an order dated 20/12/2019 under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.