banner_ad

As per Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rule 1963 in the absence of proseqution appeal can be treated as unadmitted


Last updated: 21 February 2012

Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Brief :
Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decisions of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), we treat the appeal of the assessee as unadmitted and dismiss the same.

Citation :
Lea International Limited. B-1/E-27, Mohan Coop. Industrial Estate New Delhi. (PAN/GIR No.AAACL8229R)(Appellant) Vs. ADIT, Intl. Taxation,Circle 3 (1),New Delhi.(Respondent)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

(DELHI BENCH `D’: NEW DELHI)

BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND

SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.3715/Del./2011

(Assessment Year: 2005-06)

Lea International Limited.

B-1/E-27, Mohan Coop. Industrial Estate

New Delhi.

 (PAN/GIR No.AAACL8229R)

(Appellant)

Vs.

ADIT, Intl. Taxation,

Circle 3 (1),

New Delhi.

(Respondent)

                                                               Assessee by: None

Revenue by: Dr. M.L. Meena, Sr.DR

ORDER

PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M.

This appeal of the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT (A)- XXIX, New Delhi dated 24.05.2011, relevant to assessment year 2005-06.

2. Despite sending defect memo and notice of hearing sufficiently in advance, assessee did not respond either to defect memo or notice of hearing. So, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of this appeal.

3. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decisions of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), we treat the appeal of the assessee as unadmitted and dismiss the same.

4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Order pronounced in open court soon after the conclusion of the hearing on 16.02.2012.

                                                        Sd/-                                                 Sd/-

                                              (B.C. MEENA)                               (U.B.S. BEDI)

                                      ACCOUNTANT MEMBER            JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated : February 16, 2012

SKB

Copy of the order forwarded to:-

1. Appellant

2. Respondent

3. CIT

4. CIT(A)-XXIX, New Delhi.

5. CIT(ITAT)                                                                                    Deputy Registrar, ITAT

 

CCI Pro

CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1187

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
26 May 2026
Audit executive

vdsr & co LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 June 2026
Article

Rakhecha & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
04 June 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Goyal Puneet & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 May 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 May 2026
Accounts Executive

Nafa Group

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Karan Gupta & Co.

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
16 May 2026
Account & Audit Asst

RAHUL KHANDEBHARAD & ASSOCIATES

Nashik

B.Com

View Details