ANIL K SHAH (HUF), Mumbai VS ITO WARD 23 (2)(1), Mumbai
Last updated: 16 December 2020
Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
These appeals have been filed against the two orders dated 31.08.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-39 (for short ‘the CIT(A), Mumbai, for the assessment years 2009-10, whereby the Ld. CIT(A) has partly allowed the appeals filed by the assessee against the assessment orders passed u/s 143 (3) r.w.s. 147 and u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’). Since, these appeals pertain to the same person in the individual capacity and in the capacity of HUF and the issues involved are identical, these were clubbed, heard together and are being disposed of for the sake of convenience.
Citation :
ITA No. 214/MUM/2019
You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :
Stay updated! Stay ads free
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Original Price : INR 2999/-
Offer Price : INR 1999/-
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Know More
Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 85
downloaded 120 times
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
Live Course on EPF & ESI Act - Mastercourse(With Govt Certificate)
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan16 June 2025
CAclubindia
