Adjudication order in respect of 9 entities in the matter of Maa Jagdambe Tradelinks Limited

Last updated: 12 November 2020
Quick Summary
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued an adjudication order against nine entities concerning fraudulent manipulation in the scrip of Maa Jagdambe Tradelinks Limited. The investigation focused on the generation of bogus Long Term Capital Gains during the period of May 1, 2013, to July 31, 2015. The entities are alleged to have violated SEBI's Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (PFUTP) Regulations.

Court :
SEBI

Brief :
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) initiated investigation in the scrip of Maa Jagdambe Tradelinks Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “company/ MJTL”) regarding allegations of generation of bogus Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) in the scrip of MJTL during the period May 1, 2013 to July 31, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “investigation period”).

Citation :
[ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. Order/AA/JR/2020-21/9542-9550]

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in LAW
Views : 172
downloaded 336 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Partners of a Partnership Firm are personally liable for GST dues of the Firm and bank account of an erstwhile partner can be attached for recovery
  2. Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act
  3. Show Cause Notice issued to a non-existent amalgamated company is void ab initio and cannot be saved by Section 87 of the CGST Act
  4. SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  5. CESTAT Sets Aside ₹60 Crore Service Tax Demand: Best-Judgment Assessment Cannot Be Based on Guesswork
  6. CESTAT: Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake Is a Deposit — Refund Not Barred by Section 11B Limitation
  7. CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption on Rent to Educational Institution for Lack of Evidence
  8. CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand on Undervaluation of Imported Goods Based on Chinese Customs Documents
  9. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  10. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member CA TARUN JINDALCA TARUN JINDALPro Member DEEPAK MARAPUREDDYDEEPAK MARAPUREDDYPro Member Anjum AshrafAnjum AshrafPro Member rana andcompanyrana andcompanyPro Member Gurunathan kannanGurunathan kannan
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category