Aggrieved by the order dated 10/01/2017 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, New Delhi ('Ld. CIT(A)') for the assessment year 2012-13, Arvind Kaushik (?the assessee?) filed this appeal.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘ A’ NEW DLEHI
BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Assessment Year: 2012-13
WA-116, Shakarpur, Delhi
PAN : AJKPK8536G
Ward 60(5), New Delhi.
Appellant by : Sh. Sameer Kapoor, Advocate
Respondent by: Sh. Jagdish Singh, Sr.DR
Date of hearing: 27/07/2021
Date of order : 27/07/2021
Aggrieved by the order dated 10/01/2017 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, New Delhi ("Ld. CIT(A)") for the assessment year 2012-13, Arvind Kaushik (“the assessee”) filed this appeal.
2. Aggrieved by such additions, assessee preferred appeal before the ld. CIT(A) and by way of the impugned order, ld. CIT(A) granted partial relief to the assessee by deleting certain additions and remitting the amounts in respect of certain additions.
3.Coming to the addition in respect of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the assessment order speaks that the assessee failed to furnish evidences of TDS in respect of the payments made to the consultancy charges u/s. 194J of the Act and, therefore, addition was made to the extent of Rs.10,39,141/-.
4.We have gone through the records in the light of submissions made on either side. Amount of the subject matter of disallowance is not in dispute, which is Rs.3,98,932/-. However, the question is whether entire amount has to be disallowed or only 30% thereof has to be disallowed.
5. Therefore, direct the Assessing Officer to disallow 25% out of the disallowance of Rs.39,84,917/-. Subject to this observation, ground No. 2 is allowed in part.
6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part.
Order pronounced in the open court on this the 27th day of July, 2021.
Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement