A O must give evidence that assessee received amount more than he disclosed for the application of Sec 260A of IT Act 1961
Court :
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Brief :
This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the ct”) against the order dated 25.4.2008 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal” for short) in Appeal No.1056/DEL/2006 for the assessment year 2002-2003. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law:
“Whether the learned ITAT erred in law and on merits in restricting the addition on account of difference in sale consideration of unquoted shares to Rs.1,71,000/- by totally ignoring the value as itself declared by the assessee?”
Citation :
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX …… Appellant Versus RAJENDRA SECLEASE LTD … Respondent
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1567
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Browse by Category
Audit Executive
RBSM Corporate Advisors Private Limited
Pune
CA
View Details
Articles
Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants
Mumbai
CA Foundation
View Details
CA Article Assistant
KK & Company Chartered Accountant
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
CCI
Pro
CAclubindia
