Hi..
1.Assesse is not liable for audit under any act wherein CA signed on the financials-udin mandatory(yes/no)
2.Assesse filed under presumptive taxation wherein CA had separately provided financials with his seal and signature-udin mandatory(yes/no)
3.Ca singed financials for assesse's bank loan purposes-udin mandatory(yes/no)
pls respond to this at the earliest. urgently required this clarifications.
thanks in advance
Menu
Udin mandatory if ca attests unaudited financials?
Replies (3)
First question, whether any of the above financials have been uploaded in any portal of government with CA signature or not?plz confirm. If not than you may skip UDIN but banks will not accept financials for loan as they insist on UDIN. For them signature don't serves any purpose due to forgery blunders of CA signature (impersonation) in recent years...
For example,assesse filed itr which matched the data provided in that financials and he is not liable for any audit under income tax act however CA had signed those financials without mentioning udin number.is it acceptable?
1. udin is not always mandatory
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
Recent Threads
- Can I claim benefit under 54F if I sell my equity
- Income tax refund 25/26
- Who is responcible to pay GST Liability (If Servi
- Excess Payment on RCM
- AOC4 auto population of previous year data
- Exports against INR PO payable by Domestic Company
- Which websites are best for government exam prepar
- TDS on maturity payment of LIC of india
- ITR2 Gold ETF short and long term
- Query under faceless assessment
Related Threads
CAclubindia
