Hi..
1.Assesse is not liable for audit under any act wherein CA signed on the financials-udin mandatory(yes/no)
2.Assesse filed under presumptive taxation wherein CA had separately provided financials with his seal and signature-udin mandatory(yes/no)
3.Ca singed financials for assesse's bank loan purposes-udin mandatory(yes/no)
pls respond to this at the earliest. urgently required this clarifications.
thanks in advance
Menu
Udin mandatory if ca attests unaudited financials?
Replies (3)
First question, whether any of the above financials have been uploaded in any portal of government with CA signature or not?plz confirm. If not than you may skip UDIN but banks will not accept financials for loan as they insist on UDIN. For them signature don't serves any purpose due to forgery blunders of CA signature (impersonation) in recent years...
For example,assesse filed itr which matched the data provided in that financials and he is not liable for any audit under income tax act however CA had signed those financials without mentioning udin number.is it acceptable?
1. udin is not always mandatory
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
Recent Threads
- Turf Club Veterinary Department. Procurement Manua
- I have wrongly shown itc in reclaimable itc inste
- Help reqd in getting Professional Tax challan
- New form 139 as per Tax Act 2025
- In GST maintain invoices or bill in excel instead
- How to paid income tax in block return in itrb
- RCM Applicable for Man Power Supply (URD) to Regis
- Guidance Required for CA Final Group 2
- Income tax challan in block itrb
- CREDIT NOTE RECEIVED AGAINST REVERSAL OF ITC ON EA
Related Threads
CAclubindia
