Hi..
1.Assesse is not liable for audit under any act wherein CA signed on the financials-udin mandatory(yes/no)
2.Assesse filed under presumptive taxation wherein CA had separately provided financials with his seal and signature-udin mandatory(yes/no)
3.Ca singed financials for assesse's bank loan purposes-udin mandatory(yes/no)
pls respond to this at the earliest. urgently required this clarifications.
thanks in advance
Menu
Udin mandatory if ca attests unaudited financials?
Replies (3)
First question, whether any of the above financials have been uploaded in any portal of government with CA signature or not?plz confirm. If not than you may skip UDIN but banks will not accept financials for loan as they insist on UDIN. For them signature don't serves any purpose due to forgery blunders of CA signature (impersonation) in recent years...
For example,assesse filed itr which matched the data provided in that financials and he is not liable for any audit under income tax act however CA had signed those financials without mentioning udin number.is it acceptable?
1. udin is not always mandatory
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
Recent Topics :
- Capital gains on sale of flat from wife to husband
- TDS filing for the 1st quarter of TY 2026-27
- Login into Old Traces Portal
- Professional Income reporting in ITR-3
- Pf exemption in hand of spouse on demised of husba
- Missed deadline to revise ITR for a foreign asset
- Durga Puja 2026 Dates: Mahalaya, Shashthi to Vijay
- Indo-MIM IPO Allotment Date, Status Check and List
- GSTR 1 filed but GSTR 3 B no filed
- ITR FORM FILING REGARDS
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
