Hi..
1.Assesse is not liable for audit under any act wherein CA signed on the financials-udin mandatory(yes/no)
2.Assesse filed under presumptive taxation wherein CA had separately provided financials with his seal and signature-udin mandatory(yes/no)
3.Ca singed financials for assesse's bank loan purposes-udin mandatory(yes/no)
pls respond to this at the earliest. urgently required this clarifications.
thanks in advance
Menu
Udin mandatory if ca attests unaudited financials?
Replies (3)
First question, whether any of the above financials have been uploaded in any portal of government with CA signature or not?plz confirm. If not than you may skip UDIN but banks will not accept financials for loan as they insist on UDIN. For them signature don't serves any purpose due to forgery blunders of CA signature (impersonation) in recent years...
For example,assesse filed itr which matched the data provided in that financials and he is not liable for any audit under income tax act however CA had signed those financials without mentioning udin number.is it acceptable?
1. udin is not always mandatory
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
Recent Topic
- AIS UTILITY
- NPS Premature withdrawl -Tier 1 Account
- Provident fund taxation
- ITR3 AY 26-27 Error in filling status
- Queries on TDS as per IT
- Capital Gains set off on Sale of Land if held for
- ITR Form for income from freelance consultancy
- Gst rate for HSN code 28530010
- Health Insurance
- India GST Mobile App
Related Topics
CAclubindia
