Hi..
1.Assesse is not liable for audit under any act wherein CA signed on the financials-udin mandatory(yes/no)
2.Assesse filed under presumptive taxation wherein CA had separately provided financials with his seal and signature-udin mandatory(yes/no)
3.Ca singed financials for assesse's bank loan purposes-udin mandatory(yes/no)
pls respond to this at the earliest. urgently required this clarifications.
thanks in advance
Menu
Udin mandatory if ca attests unaudited financials?
Replies (3)
Quick Summary
First question, whether any of the above financials have been uploaded in any portal of government with CA signature or not?plz confirm. If not than you may skip UDIN but banks will not accept financials for loan as they insist on UDIN. For them signature don't serves any purpose due to forgery blunders of CA signature (impersonation) in recent years...
For example,assesse filed itr which matched the data provided in that financials and he is not liable for any audit under income tax act however CA had signed those financials without mentioning udin number.is it acceptable?
1. udin is not always mandatory
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
2. assesse filed under presumptive taxation udin required
3. yes
Recent Topics :
- Invoice made but goods not sent
- How Do CA Firms Manage Client Document Collection
- How do CA firms manage pending client documents du
- How to find a good CA
- Rcm on rent paid
- Clarify on GST Application
- Residential status for overseas students visitin
- Capital Gains Tax
- LTCG 112A and business loss
- FAST-DS 2026 applicability: foreign employee share
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
