Tax cushion for losses through trading errors

There is a sliver of cheer for brokerage houses grappling with shrinking revenues. The outcome of legal disputes between stock broking firms and Income-Tax department — on the treatment of losses arising from dealing errors — may provide some breather to the broking industry. Moreover, policymakers could view the rulings as a yardstick for amending Section 73 of the Income Tax Act. UBS Securities and BLK Securities have secured rulings in their favour. According to Section 73 of the I-T Act, a company is said to indulge in speculative behaviour to the extent that it purchases and sells shares of other companies. Therefore, losses arising from such transactions are treated as speculative losses. However, broking houses have occasionally suffered losses on account of dealing errors involving the punching of wrong quantity, price and instructions ('buy' instead of 'sell' and vice-versa) into the trading terminal. If a trading error is confirmed at the end of the day, the broker reverses the order by taking a hit and claiming it as business loss for tax purposes. Broking firms have been demanding that since the transactions are done on behalf of clients, the losses arising from dealing errors should be treated as business losses. But the I-T department treats these as speculative losses under section 73 and disallows them to be set off against other business income. "Since the transactions are not undertaken on behalf of share broking firms themselves, section 73 of the I-T Act is not applicable and such losses should be considered as business expenses," said a partner at a leading law firm. "For tax purposes, a speculative loss can be squared off against a speculative gain and a trading business loss can be adjusted against trading business gains. A trading business loss can be carried forward for eight years, while a speculative business loss only has a 4-year window. Hence, it is better for the broking firm to term losses in dealing errors as trading losses," explained a chartered accountant, who did not wish to be named. – www.economictimes.indiatimes.com

Replies (1)

NICE SHARING!!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
24 August 2026
Semi-Qualified CA/CA Finalist - Tax, GST, Audit & Accounts

Bharat Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 August 2026
Article Assistant

RRPM & ASSOCIATES LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 August 2026
Assistant Manager

NRS AND ASSOCIATES

Kozhikode

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 August 2026
International Corporate Tax Advisory

Shulke

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 August 2026
Article Assistant

Sanath Sheshagiri & Co.

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
COMPLIANCE EXECUTIVE

YMW COMPLIANCE SERVICES LLP

Others

CA Final

View Details
Company
14 August 2026
Semi Qualified

Goyanka & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
04 September 2026
CA inter Or ca finalist

A Jaiswal and company

Lucknow

CA Final

View Details