CA in Practice
                
                   35867 Points
                   Joined June 2009
                
               
			  
			  
             
            
             
	Dear Devanshi Gandhi
	Please quote some section or any case law in support of your claim.
	In the case law there is mention that the same is applicable before introduction of rule 32B prescribing the minimum stipend rules was prescribed by the Institute which do not follow the follow the practice of paying a meager amount to meet the cost of books, fees, etc and hence cannot be termed as receipt for the purpose of meeting the cost of education to be exempt u/s 10(16).
	Even Madhusudhan who was supporting the case law is agreeing with me.