Section 45(3) Vs. Section 50C

3037 views 2 replies

There has been long ranging debate as to whether provisions of Section 50C are applicable or not when partner contributes as capital any assets in the firm. Or Whether sales consideration will be determined according to the provision of Section 45(3) itself.

I came across a very recent order of Lucknow tribunal which states:

Where immovable property is transferred by a partner to the firm as a capital contribution and registration does not take place by paying stamp duty, the case would be covered under section 45(3) and provisions of section 50C cannot be invoked. Section 50C override section 45(3) only if the sale deed is sought to be registered by paying stamp duty.

Carlton Hotel (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2009) 122 TTJ 515 (Luck.)

Although the line which I have highlighted has become redundant as after the passing Finance Act, 2009, Section 50C is applicable whether stamp duty is actually assessed or not.

Replies (2)

In the tranferred asset in a capital assset being land or building or both, the provisions of Sec.50C will get attaracted in every case. Bcoz' Sec.50C calls for taking the value of these assets as a sale consideration. even if it is transferred to partnership firm, the value shall hve to be taken considering Sec.50C.

 

and as u mentioned, the FA 2009 brought the words 'assessable' which deems the value as if it is registered with SVA.!!!!!!!!!!

That's what I meant to say!

Now after FA 2009 there will be no specific requirement of getting the stamp value assessed and 50C will be applicable in any case.

Therefore the conclusion: After the amendment, the above mentioned order will hold good even if no registration (with the SVA) is sought for the asset transferred. 


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Related Threads
Loading