Section 142[1] of IT Act notice

Dept issued notice u/s. 142[1] and we have appointed Partner of one CA Firm ad our Authorised signatory by Power of Attorney.  Query is that which letter head is to be used by him- ours/ plain sheet/CA firm letterhead. 

Please guide

Replies (3)
Quick Summary
A company has received a notice under Section 142[1] of the IT Act and appointed a CA firm's partner as their authorised signatory via Power of Attorney. They are seeking guidance on which letterhead the signatory should use for correspondence: the company's, a plain sheet, or the CA firm's. The consensus is that if the CA partner is officially representing the case as an attorney, they should file their authority on stamp paper and not use the appointing company's letterhead.

If the jobwork is retained by firm, he will use firm's letterhead, otherwise his personal.

Sir

The partner of CA firm is statutory auditor of another sister concern. Professional service is sought from him for handling this notice. So your advice is not to use our [ appointing authority] letterhead. Is there any case law or Section?

Regards

If he is oficially representing your case in person as your Attorney, he will not use your letterhead. He will file his authority on stamp paper.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register