Query Regarding Capital Gains Computation and Cost of Acquisition under Section 49 of the Income Tax

984 views 5 replies

Query Regarding Capital Gains Computation and Cost of Acquisition under Section 49 of the Income Tax Act

A father, Mr. X, gifted a property to his son, Mr. Y, transferring 100% ownership. Subsequently, one year later, Mr. Y gifted 50% of the same property to his wife, Mrs. Y.

Now, during the event of selling the property, Mr. Y plans to compute his capital gains by considering 50% of the cost of acquisition under his own ownership, as per the provisions of Section 49 of the Income Tax Act.

The question arises regarding the computation of capital gains for Mrs. Y:
Since Mrs. Y acquired her share of the property as a gift from Mr. Y, can she adopt the cost of acquisition of the previous owner before Mr. Y (i.e., Mr. X) for her 50% share? The explanation under sub-section (1) of Section 49, which refers to the "last previous owner," appears unclear in this context.

Can someone clarify how the cost of acquisition should be determined for Mrs. Y when computing her capital gains, considering the relationship between the transferors?

Replies (5)
Quick Summary
This discussion clarifies the computation of capital gains tax when a property is gifted multiple times. It addresses how the cost of acquisition is determined for the final recipient, particularly concerning Section 49 of the Income Tax Act. The consensus is that the cost of acquisition for the final owner will trace back to the original owner who acquired the property, even through subsequent gifts between family members.

To compute capital gains for Mrs. Y, you'll need to determine the cost of acquisition for her 50% share.

Step 1: Understanding Section 49 of the Income Tax Act Section 49 deals with the cost of acquisition in cases of gift, will, or inheritance.

The explanation under sub-section (1) refers to the "last previous owner," which, in this case, is Mr. Y.

Step 2: Determining the Cost of Acquisition for Mrs. Y Since Mrs. Y acquired her share as a gift from Mr. Y, she'll consider Mr. Y's cost of acquisition for her 50% share.

However, Mr. Y had acquired the property as a gift from his father, Mr. X.

 Step 3: Considering the Relationship Between Transferors Given the relationship between Mr. X (father) and Mr. Y (son), and subsequently between Mr. Y and Mrs. Y, the cost of acquisition for Mrs. Y will be the cost of acquisition of Mr. X, as Mr. Y had not incurred any cost while acquiring the property from his father. The final answer is: $\boxed{Cost of acquisition of Mr. X}$

To compute capital gains for Mrs. Y, you'll need to determine the cost of acquisition for her 50% share.

Step 1: Understanding Section 49 of the Income Tax Act Section 49 deals with the cost of acquisition in cases of gift, will, or inheritance.

The explanation under sub-section (1) refers to the "last previous owner," which, in this case, is Mr. Y.

Step 2: Determining the Cost of Acquisition for Mrs. Y Since Mrs. Y acquired her share as a gift from Mr. Y, she'll consider Mr. Y's cost of acquisition for her 50% share.

However, Mr. Y had acquired the property as a gift from his father, Mr. X.

 Step 3: Considering the Relationship Between Transferors Given the relationship between Mr. X (father) and Mr. Y (son), and subsequently between Mr. Y and Mrs. Y, the cost of acquisition for Mrs. Y will be the cost of acquisition of Mr. X, as Mr. Y had not incurred any cost while acquiring the property from his father. The final answer is: $\boxed{Cost of acquisition of Mr. X}$

The long term capital gain would be 100% over the son, due to clubbing provision.

So, Consider the cost for Mr. X as cost of acquisition of his father.

Thank you Rama chary Rachakonda Sir for your detailed response.

Dhirajlal Rambhia Sir since this is a house property the clubbing provisions will still be applicable?

Income of individual to include income of spouse, minor child, etc.

Section 64 IT act. (1) In computing the total income of any individual, there shall be included all such income as arises directly or indirectly—

 (i) [Omitted by the Finance Act, 1992, w.e.f. 1-4-1993.]

(ii) to the spouse of such individual by way of salary, commission, fees or any other form of remuneration whether in cash or in kind from a concern in which such individual has a substantial interest :

Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply in relation to any income arising to the spouse where the spouse possesses technical or professional qualifications and the income is solely attributable to the application of his or her technical or professional knowledge and experience ;

(iii) [Omitted by the Finance Act, 1992, w.e.f. 1-4-1993.]

(iv) subject to the provisions of clause (i) of section 27, to the spouse of such individual from assets transferred directly or indirectly to the spouse by such individual otherwise than for adequate consideration or in connection with an agreement to live apart;   ,,,,,,

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 July 2026
Article Assistants

R Shyam and Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
05 July 2026
Financial Controller

NovumLake Partners

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Felicity Adobe LLP

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Semi qualified CA

Garg Bros & Associate CA

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 July 2026
Senior Executive/ Manager

H S SHARMA AND CO

Pune

CA Final

View Details
Company
22 July 2026
Senior Chartered Accountant

SKSS

Patna

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details