Proposed scheme of new CA course released

ICAI ALSO SHOULD BE REDUCED ARTICELSHIP TRANING THREE YEAR TO TWO YEAR  & GIVE ONE YEAR PERIOD FOR STUDY FOR APPEARING IN FINAL EXAMINATION INSTEAD 3RD YEAR OF ARTICELSHIP.

AND ONE MORE THING TO DO TO ICAI RESTRICTIONS OF ATTEMPT MAXIMUM 2 ATTEMPT GIVEN PER GROUP. BECAUSE CA COURSE ALREADY  TIME CONSUMING COURSE. IF STUDENT BECOME CA AGE 30 WHAT WILL BE BENFIT DOING CA. WHEN WILL BE SETTELD IN THEIR LIFE.

NOW ABOUT THE RESULT

RESULT SHOULD BE DECLARED ON MERIT BASIS NOT DEMAND AND SUPPLY BASIS BECAUSE STUDENTS ARE NOT TRADING OF SHARES WHICH IS LISTED ON STOCK MARKET.

NOW ABOUT THE SALARY

EVERY PASSED CA SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM ASSURANCE OF SALARY PACKAGE. BECAUSE IN METRO CITY 20-30 THOSAND PER MONTH SALRY NOT TO BE SUFFICIENT  TO SURVIVE IN METRO CITY. ATLEAST MINIMUM SALARY PACKAGE SHOULD BE 6 LAC PER ANNUM.

MERE PUBLISHED IN ANY LOCAL NEWS PAPER BY ICAI, CA NOT DONE A JOB BELOW 9 LAC PER ANNUM. ITS NOT A FACT.

ACCORDING TO MY PERSONAL OPINION THIS PROPOSED AMENDMEND OF CA COURSE IS RUBBISH AND WASTE OF TIME OF STUDENTS.

Thankfully ISCA is gone...good that they realised finally (hopefully) that, muuging up theoretical IT is of no use AND there are better equipped IT engineers and pro's to handle such things (like "big" things as told in the current syllabus)..

and the people who are correcting this paper purely values the paper just on "answer-key" basis...they never care that whether the student has written the concepts or not..as such many fail in grp-2 just coz of this subject...

I feel unless the paper is more practical oriented (like Accts or Tax) its NEVER going to add value to any student, even a good score of 80+ in isca..coz a cast majority of the students are not in metros / big cities or in a big audit firm where they might be applied, as such removing would help the majority...

anyways, its a welcome move by icai..1 more thing I personally would like to add is to split the final into 3 or 4 groups..