insertion of Rule 8D in the Income Tax Rules, 1962

Notification 35212 views 20 replies

 

NEW RULE SPECIFYING METHOD FOR DETERMINING AMOUNT OF EXPENDITURE IN RELATION TO INCOME NOT INCLUDIBLE IN TOTAL INCOME
 
Background
 
There has been considerable litigation between the assessee’s and the Tax Department ever since the insertion of Section 14A into the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) vide Finance Act 2001. Section 14A provides that for computing the income of an assessee, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which does not form part of the assessee’s total income under the IT Act. Sub section (2) to Section 14A, inserted in the IT Act vide Finance Act 2006 with effect from April 1, 2007, further stipulates that the Assessing Officer (AO) shall determine the amount of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to such income in accordance with the prescribed method, if having regard to the assessee’s accounts, he is not satisfied with the correctness of his claim.
 
Further, the provisions of Section 14A(2) also apply where the assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred in relation to such income. With a view to frame the methodology prescribed in Section 14A(2) of the IT Act, the CBDT has issued Notification No. 45/2008 dated March 24, 2008, which provides for insertion of Rule 8D in the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The said Rule 8D would apply in either of the following situations –
 
(a) Where the AO is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of expenditure made by the assessee; or
 
(b) Where the assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income.
 
The salient features of Rule 8D are as under –
 
As per sub rule 2 of Rule 8D, the expenditure in relation to income which does not form part of the total income shall be the aggregate of following amounts –
 
(i) the amount of expenditure directly relating to income which does not form part of total income;
 
(ii) in a case where the assessee has incurred expenditure by way of interest during the previous year which is not directly attributable to any particular income or receipt, an amount computed in accordance with the following formula -
 
A = amount of expenditure by way of interest (other than the amount  of interest directly relating to income which does not form part of total income) incurred during the previous year.
 
B = the average of value of investment, income from which does not or shall not form part of the total income, as appearing in the Balance Sheet of the assessee, on the first day and the last day of the previous year.
 
C = the average of total assets as appearing in the Balance Sheet of the assessee, on the first day and the last day of the previous year.
 
(iii) an amount equal to 0.5% of the average of the value of investment, income from which does not or shall not form part of the total income, as appearing in the balance sheet of the assessee, on the first day and the last day of the previous year.
 
Further, the term ‘total assets’ has been defined to mean total assets as appearing in the Balance Sheet excluding the increase on account of revaluation of assets but including the decrease on account of revaluation of assets.
 
Conclusion
The said notification was long awaited especially since sub section 2 to Section 14A was inserted into the IT Act vide Finance Act 2006 with effect from April 1, 2007.
 
Replies (20)

The (iii) proviso is the additional disallwance inspite of proportionate disallaownace.

 

 

As per notification and method of calculation allow amount is more than tax free Income. Than what will be disallow expenditure for the purpose of sec 14A

That is one of the major lacuna pointed out in representations to the Government in the abovesaid rule

The Rule has clear bias towards the Revenue

Section 14A -Rule 8D is meant as a measure of last resortonly; when it is not possible to work out the disallowance correctly having regard to the accounts.

Revenue is very harsh on exempt income.

i want to ask that Rule 8D of icome tax act will retrospectively effect from April 17 2007 or it will effect from 24th march 2008 

It will be applicable for assessment year 2008-09.

Meaning of investment for the purpose of Rule 8D

There is rationalisation effort required in this rule. The expenditure incurred irrespective of its actual utilisation is treated as incurred on Exempt Income.

Also, power to reassess income to Assessing Officer will result in more litigations.

Originally posted by :Guest
" As per notification and method of calculation allow amount is more than tax free Income. Than what will be disallow expenditure for the purpose of sec 14A ( for depriciation on motor car & fbt on it ) "


 

Originally posted by :Guest
" Meaning of investment for the purpose of Rule 8D "


 

Q. Whether disallowance u/s 14A can exceed the amount of exempt income? and further whether such an excess disallownace has to be mandatory made or not?

wel...

IT Authorities have been using this section as having retrospective effect i.e for all the assessments pending the time when this rule came into existence, ever since Mumbai special Bench,in case of ITO Vs Daga Capital Management (P) ltd.[2008], held that Rule 8D applies retrospectively on respect of all pending appeals.

 Looking at it from a different angle, Sec 295(4) doesn't give power to the Board to give retrospective effect to any rule if its tends to prejudicially affect the interest of the assessee. 

And thought the first two limbs of Rule 8D doesn't appear to affect the interest of the assessee but the THIRD limb i.e one half % of the average value of investment, income from which shall not form a part of total income.

Lets see what happens, LEts wait for the courts to decide whether this cam be applied RETROSPECTIVELY...


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register