Housing loan payment claim u/s 24 & u/s 80C by joint holders

There is no need to gather seperate certificates from bank.

While calculating Income from House property incase of CO-owners, the Gross Annual Value is divided with the no. of owners. Your wife and your father too can claim exemption U/s 24, but it belongs to a single property, the interest on house loan on an aggregate of you three should not exceed Rs.150000 or Rs.30000 as the case may be

But my wife and father want's to ONLY claim the benefit of Principal pre-payment u/s 80C for the amounts they pay respectively.

As the Interest component is being paid by me alone in form of EMI, i want to claim the same u/s 24 and principle payment u/s 80C for the EMI alone.

Yes I understood. Divide the total principal repayment by 3 and claim proportionate exemption in the return.

As the EMI is getting cut from your bank account,

the amount of proportionate loan of your wife & father is treated as loan/advance given by you to them.

similarly they treat you as unsecured loans from friends/relatives.

But the 80C provision is as under:

Sec 80C (1) In computing the total income of an assessee, being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, there shall be deducted, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, the whole of the amount paid or deposited in the previous year, being the aggregate of the sums referred to in sub-section (2), as does not exceed one lakh rupees.

 (2) The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be any sums paid or deposited in the previous year by the assessee—

                (xviii)           for the purposes of purchase or construction of a residential house property the income from which is chargeable to tax under the head “Income from house property” (or which would, if it had not been used for the assessee’s own residence, have been chargeable to tax under that head), where such payments are made towards or by way of—

      (a)  any installment or part payment of the amount due under any self-financing or other scheme of any development authority, housing board or other authority engaged in the construction and sale of house property on ownership basis; or

      (b)  any installment or part payment of the amount due to any company or co-operative society of which the assessee is a shareholder or member towards the cost of the house property allotted to him; or

      (c)  repayment of the amount borrowed by the assessee from—

      (1)  the Central Government or any State Government, or

      (2)  any bank, including a co-operative bank, or

      (3)  the Life Insurance Corporation, or

      (4)  the National Housing Bank, or

      (5)  any public company formed and registered in India with the main object of carrying on the business of providing long-term finance for construction or purchase of houses in India for residential purposes which is eligible for deduction under clause (viii) of sub-section (1) of section 36, or

      (6)  any company in which the public are substantially interested or any co-operative society, where such company or co-operative society is engaged in the business of financing the construction of houses, or

      (7)  the assessee’s employer where such employer is an authority or a board or a corporation or any other body established or constituted under a Central or State Act, or

      (8)  the assessee’s employer where such employer is a public company or a public sector company or a university established by law or a college affiliated to such university or a local authority or a co-operative society; or

The above provision reflects that the deduction u/s 80C is available only to that assessee who pays the amount borrowed and not to the assessee on who’s behalf he repays the same. Thus the ITO may take objection and disallow the same on the context that how have you attributed the payments made by Mr. X in the books of Mr. Y and Mr. Z as the same are being paid directly to the Finance institution (If Mr. X had made payment to Mr. Y and Mr. Z as a loan to repay the debt the case may have been different).

Hello!

Can anyone comment please!!!