Manager - Finance & Accounts
57776 Points
Joined June 2010
Hi Yogesh,
Thanks for elaborating further — your case is nuanced, but we can clarify it by looking closely at how GST treats leasing, ownership, and buyback transactions.
โ
Core of Your Query:
You're asking:
Since the car is registered in your name, and you're only paying the residual value (15%) to remove hypothecation from Tata Capital, is it correct for Tata Capital to charge GST + Cess on this residual payment?
๐ Key Points to Understand:
1. Who Is the Owner Under GST?
-
In RTO records: The registered owner is you.
-
Under finance lease agreements: The economic owner is usually the lessee (you), but in accounting and GST law, ownership is judged based on:
-
Substance over form, i.e., who holds control and rights during lease term.
-
Whether the lease transfers ownership at end.
So, even if the vehicle is in your name, Tata Capital may treat the lease as a supply of goods at residual value if the agreement includes ownership transfer upon final payment.
2. GST Law on Leased Vehicle Buyback:
As per GST rules and circulars:
-
If a lessor (like Tata Capital) leases a car and transfers it to the lessee (you) at the end of the lease, the final transfer is considered a supply of goods.
-
This is taxable under Section 7(1)(a) of CGST Act:
"All forms of supply of goods or services, such as sale, transfer, barter, etc., made for a consideration in the course of business"
-
Even if registered ownership is already in your name, if Tata Capital holds beneficial interest or retains hypothecation, the final payment is treated as consideration for transfer, attracting GST + Cess.
3. Relevant GST Circulars / Case References:
-
Circular No. 34/8/2018-GST:
Clarifies treatment of lease transactions and taxable value on supply of motor vehicles.
-
Advance Ruling – M/s. BMW India Financial Services Pvt Ltd (Uttarakhand AAR):
Held that transfer of vehicle at end of lease period for residual value is supply of goods and taxable.
โ
Is Tata Capital’s GST Charge Justified?
In Legal Terms:
โ
Yes, if:
-
Tata Capital had beneficial ownership during lease,
-
Lease agreement has residual value clause + ownership transfer intent,
-
You're paying a price (15%) to acquire full rights and remove hypothecation.
Then the transaction is seen as a supply of goods under HSN 8703, attracting:
This treatment holds even if the car is registered in your name, because legal ownership ≠ tax ownership in such financing structures.
โ When GST Would Not Apply:
If:
-
You already own the car fully (not just in registration, but in beneficial/tax sense),
-
Tata Capital has no right to transfer,
-
The payment is purely for removal of hypothecation (like a charge release fee),
-
No consideration is paid for asset transfer,
๐ then it's not a “supply”, and GST should not be levied.
But from your descripttion, it appears the 15% residual value is contractually structured as a final purchase price, making it liable for GST.
๐งพ Summary of GST Applicability on Car Buyback:
Scenario |
GST Applicable? |
Remarks |
Residual payment under lease to transfer vehicle |
โ
Yes (28% + Cess) |
Treated as supply of goods |
Payment only to remove hypothecation |
โ No |
If no transfer involved |
You are sole owner from day one |
โ No |
Only finance charges applicable |
Lease from Tata Capital with residual buyback |
โ
Yes |
GST applicable on residual value |
โ
What You Can Do:
-
Review the Lease Agreement:
-
Ask Tata Capital for GST Invoice:
-
They must raise a tax invoice if treating it as a sale.
-
Check HSN Code, tax rate, and value mentioned.
-
Consult with your company's tax advisor:
-
If you believe this is not a sale, consider:
-
Writing to Tata Capital for legal clarification,
-
Filing a representation or even applying for Advance Ruling (optional, but costly/time-consuming).