banner_ad

Doubt

319 views 2 replies
A person is a citizen of USA & is a resident and ordinarily resident in India.He has a self occupied property in USA as well as in India.He stays in both the properties during the year,then why only one will be treated as self occupied even though the other one is not let out?
Replies (2)

Nidhi the Income Tax department wants revenue from the taxpayers. So as per me, the concept behind it should b that y the property should b kept vaccant, if one can earn from it by letting it out. By not letting out the property the government is also getting no Tax (which it could earn from it). And an opportunity to provide residence to a personel is also NIL. Thats Y the government wants to encourage earning. As a result of it the revenue (tax) will b increased in the Govt. Account.

 

That's y it is treated as deemed to b let out.  

No body could give a better explanation than this..tysm


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details