INCREDIBLE UPA GOVT,WORST BUDGET EVER SEEN BEFORE,PERHAPS NEVER AFTER,HOPE NOT TO SEE.
INCREDIBLE UPA GOVT,WORST BUDGET EVER SEEN BEFORE,PERHAPS NEVER AFTER,HOPE NOT TO SEE.
INCREDIBLE UPA GOVT,WORST BUDGET EVER SEEN BEFORE,PERHAPS NEVER AFTER,HOPE NOT TO SEE.
i think there is a printing mistake..... the budget says "the rates are specified for A.Y. 2012-13"
When will they come out with the white paper of black money? Huge amount of unaccounted black money is the cause of common man's financial woes. If corruption is prevented on all levels of administration, to some extent inflation can come down.
Some highlights of Budget:
It`s becoming clearer that the Budget will do nothing to change the course of the economy. It is all incremental stuff so far - nothing to set the Hooghly on fire
One more update - Small service provider exemption increased from Rs 10L to Rs 50L
Please help.
I am having aquery regarding tax audit linit that the limit of Rs. 1 crore is being made applicable to all the assessees who had tax audit u/s 44AB in the A.Y. 2012-13 or applies only to the assessees who are registered as SME with the relevant authorities ?
@ kalpesh .....This limit is for all...not just for SME alone, as far as I know.BUt still not so sure.
the budget seems like made while dreaming, India's conditions are totally ignored.
I personally don't feel the budget to be good. It really puts a question on the saving ......
correct me, if I am wrong somewhere ......
friends goverment ne mast band bajia SC ki decision ki band bja di by over ridding effect of VODAFONE case heheheh
Indian Budget 2012: A critical analysis
Union Budget of 2012, pronounced on 16th March, 2012, fails to deliver expectations of entire feternity of taxpayers except few lollypops which may not be siffice. A critical analysis of this budget is summarized in following points:
- Retrospectively amendments in tax law as far as the Vodafone case is concerned. It will result in loss of confidence in Indian financial policies among foreign investors and would result in negative growth in FDI.
- Applicability of tax deducted at source provisions on only cash sale of bullion and jewellery of value more than Rs. 2 lacs. It will encourage jewellers to undervalue invoicing or result in isolated transactions also.
- Applicability of GAAR provisions in a manner which cast onus on taxpayer to prove commercial acceptance of transaction. Such provisions drafted in such a manner which shows no trust of government on taxpayer.
- Applicability of Alternative minimum tax on other taxpayers also apart from corporate and LLP. It would result in complications in tax computing for small businesses running in proprietorship or partnership forms which were out of these provisions till date.
- Amendment by omitting reference of part III of old schedule VI in sec 115JB as part III is omitted in revised schedule. Such amendment was expected retrospectively in view of applicability of revised schedule VI w.e.f. FY 11-12. Thus it will leave a room for corporate to prepare Profit & Loss accounts for sec 115JB(2) purpose as per old schedule VI for FY 11-12.
- Applicability of provisions of tax deducted at source on all transaction of transfer or immoveable property other then agriculture land exceeds Rs. 25 lac. And no registration is possible without showing proof of deduction of tax and deposite of the same in revenue account. It would result in compliance burdon and delays in land acquisition process for industries in case if transferor having no PAN.
- Applicability of provisions of transfer pricing regulations on domestic specified transactions also which results in excess compliance burdon and obligation of maintaining excessive records on taxpayer which results in enhancement of administrative cost of department as well as of assessee. Further lots of cases are laying pending in judiciary related to international transactions and by viding scope of TPR provisions results in increase in disputes traffics.
Hope group of lobbies draw attention of policy makers towards these critics and seek intervention in the matter.
Go through the attachment !!! frnds
13. In section 44AB of the Income-tax Act,—
(i) in clause (a), for the words “sixty lakh rupees”, the words “one crore rupees” shall be substituted with effect from the 1st day of April, 2013;
(ii) in clause (b), for the words “fifteen lakh rupees”, the words “twenty-five lakh rupees” shall be substituted with effect from the 1st day of April, 2013;
Hike of excise duty and service tax may lead to increase the product prices in future. comman people suffering inflation problem. govt. could have to increase the other taxes like wealth tax. govt. should have to maintain balance between poor and rich people.
Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies
Click here to Login / Register
India's largest network for
finance professionals