reallu unable to know how i got my paper? dont know whether i vl pass or not
CA Rohan Bajaj
(CA)
(142 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
reallu unable to know how i got my paper? dont know whether i vl pass or not
CA Debashree Mishra
(Fresher)
(142 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
well....actually i think question 2 took most of the time and after that much time wasnt left to solve other portion properly...some points seem to be easy at the first look but while solving.....Confusion hi confusion tha :P
PS: Jo paper dete hain unke liye tough, Jo next attempts denge unke liye nighmares dene wala and JO PASS HO GAYE...... huh unke Liye "Oh Kitna easy thaaaaa Ye icai to CA Final ka level gira raha hai ' :P
priya shukla
(CA final)
(133 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
Originally posted by : Debashree Mishra | ||
well....actually i think question 2 took most of the time and after that much time wasnt left to solve other portion properly...some points seem to be easy at the first look but while solving.....Confusion hi confusion tha :P PS: Jo paper dete hain unke liye tough, Jo next attempts denge unke liye nighmares dene wala and JO PASS HO GAYE...... huh unke Liye "Oh Kitna easy thaaaaa Ye icai to CA Final ka level gira raha hai ' :P |
very true
ANIRBAN DAS
(CMA, B.Com, CA Final,)
(1522 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
CA Debashree Mishra
(Fresher)
(142 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
Originally posted by : ANIRBAN DAS | ||
i felt the paper was average just like last time....not too easy neither too tough.......it was good that 2 case law questions came.....and interest questions also were asked.....i did one blunder where i wrote answer to question 6(d) as no but then i crossed it and wrote yes...but then i came home and found out that my earlier answer was the correct one....i lost 3 marks i really hope the 3 marks dont make me fail... |
hehe yea that happens. First choice is generally correct as per my own experience hehe :) Have faith in God :)
Jeril Satheesh
(CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT)
(56 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
@ Ramakrishnan..... Its ' Shanti Bhushan case not Prasanth Bhushan'
TARUN MATHUR
(Articled Assistant)
(71 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
deepak vyas
(manager accounts)
(49 Points)
Replied 16 November 2012
paper was not easy , All question require presence of mind. I have lost 25 marks due to wrong choice select.
M. N. JHA
(CA)
(8316 Points)
Replied 17 November 2012
Download solution
at
/forum/ca-final-nov-2012-solution-download-227681.asp#.UKahouTqk8o
CourseCart.in
(Mentor at SHAYVIDZ Academy)
(3756 Points)
Replied 17 November 2012
Shanti Bhushan v. CIT (2011) 336 ITR 26 (Delhi)
Fact : The assessee was a lawyer by profession. He contended that the heart should be treated as plant as it is used for the purpose of his professional work and expenditure on heart surgery should be allowed as business expenditure either u/s 31 as current repairs to plant or u/s 37 as an expense incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of profession.
Decision : The High Court held that:-
As per Sec 37, the said expenditure must be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of assessee’s profession. Healthy heart will increase the efficiency of human being IN EVERY FIELD including professional work. Therefore, there is NO DIRECT NEXUS between said expenditure and his efficiency in the professional field.
CourseCart.in
(Mentor at SHAYVIDZ Academy)
(3756 Points)
Replied 17 November 2012
CIT (TDS) v. ITC Ltd. (2011) 338 ITR 598 (Del.)
The assessee company was engaged in the business of owning, operating and managing Hotels.
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India