Originally posted by : Rakesh Dhanuka |
|
Two-third of the total number of directors shall be persons whose office is liable to determination by retirement of directors by rotation.........so in your case............2/3 of 5 is 3.33 which is to be rounderd off to 4............hence 4 directors shall be such who is liable to retire by rotation
and as per section 256 1/3rd of the such directors (4 in ur case) which comes to 1.33 rounded off to 2 dirs shall retire by rotation in every AGM who been longest in office.........
hope this will be helpful to understand......experts plz rectify if am wrong... |
|
Agree with Rakesh, but at some points, i have a dif. openion.
as section 256(1) says,
"At the first annual general meeting of a public company, or a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company held next after the date of the general meeting at which the first directors are appointed in accordance with section 255 and at every subsequent annual general meeting, one-third of such of the directors for the time being as are liable to retire by rotation, or if their number is not three or a multiple of three, then, the number nearest to one-third, shall retire from office."
above statement says Nearest to the one-third. it means we can retire 1 director as well, but..
if we go for the purpose of this provision, it emphasizes on the retirement of the directors at least once in every three years, so... for this purpose, we can opt the options as..... retire 1, 1 and 2 director in first, second and third year respectively.
Experts comments are welcome...
Regards,
Aditya