Clarification on case law

Tax queries 566 views 1 replies

HI All

I have not understood the below case law,

CIT Vs Yamaha Motor India

"(Would the phrase " used for purpose of business" in respect of discarded machine include use of such assiet in the earlier year for claim of depreciation).

 

kindly explain with example.

Thanks in advance

Replies (1)

It means that whether the machine was being used in the earlier years for the purpose of the business, as depreciation can be claimed only if the machine is being used wholly for the purpose of carrying on the business.  if it was used in the earlier other than the purpose of the business then the depreciation claim would be disallowed.

Therefore in the above case, the said phrase is being used.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
18 May 2026
MIS Executive

Primarc Pecan Retail Limited

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Audit assistant

Displayandbeyond

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Article, CA & Paid Assistant Positions

Aggarwal Sarawagi and Co

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Article Assistant

Geeta Manchanda & CO.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 26 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
24 May 2026
Accounts & Tax Executive

PARAS KHURANA AND CO

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 May 2026
SEMI QUALIFIED/ CA DROPOUTS/ ARTICLES

T R SOOD & CO

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Winshine Financial Services

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details