Festive Savings Are Here. Get 10% OFF on All CCI Pro Plans. Subscribe Now!

Clarification on case law

616 views

Save Share

Join Us Follow Us Add as Source

work is worship

Service

1392 Points Posted on 08 May 2012

HI All

I have not understood the below case law,

CIT Vs Yamaha Motor India

"(Would the phrase " used for purpose of business" in respect of discarded machine include use of such assiet in the earlier year for claim of depreciation).

kindly explain with example.

Thanks in advance

Replies (1)

Giridhar S Karandikar

Team Lead

5675 Points Posted on 08 May 2012

It means that whether the machine was being used in the earlier years for the purpose of the business, as depreciation can be claimed only if the machine is being used wholly for the purpose of carrying on the business. if it was used in the earlier other than the purpose of the business then the depreciation claim would be disallowed.

Therefore in the above case, the said phrase is being used.