banner_ad

Clarification on case law

Tax queries 552 views 1 replies

HI All

I have not understood the below case law,

CIT Vs Yamaha Motor India

"(Would the phrase " used for purpose of business" in respect of discarded machine include use of such assiet in the earlier year for claim of depreciation).

 

kindly explain with example.

Thanks in advance

Replies (1)

It means that whether the machine was being used in the earlier years for the purpose of the business, as depreciation can be claimed only if the machine is being used wholly for the purpose of carrying on the business.  if it was used in the earlier other than the purpose of the business then the depreciation claim would be disallowed.

Therefore in the above case, the said phrase is being used.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details