TaXpert
15116 Points
Joined September 2007
Yes he has to pay FBT. FBT is on expenses and not on employees, however there should be at least one employee in that organisation
Chartered Accountants
55 Points
Joined September 2007
hi,
the applicability of FBT is not for individual ..
so there will not be any fbt on any of expenses incurred by an individual firm
Guest
428680 Points
Joined August 2012
I THINK MR. BISHNU IS RIGHT BCOZ FBT IS NOT APPLICABLE ON PROP. FIRM.
Account Executive
136 Points
Joined October 2007
Yes, FBT is applicable
Chartered Accountant
157 Points
Joined October 2007
FBT is on expenses incurred on behalf of employees. this is what I have understood. If mortor car is used by the proprietor for his bussiness and not use by the employee, will there be any FBT. Hope I am putting my ? clear.
quote:
1)any privilege, service, facility or amenity, directly or indirectly, provided by an employer, whether by way of reimbursement or otherwise, to his employees (including former employee or employees);
2)The fringe benefits shall be deemed to have been provided by the employer to his employees, if the employer has, in the course of his business or profession (including any activity whether or not such activity is carried on with the object of deriving income, profits or gains) incurred any expense on,
Question: (1) should there be a necessity to incur exp on employees "or"
(2) with or without employees, will the expenses classified shall be deemed to liable for FBT.
Hope I am putting my ? clear.
Thanks
Chartered Accountant
157 Points
Joined October 2007
FBT is on expenses incurred on behalf of employees. this is what I have understood. If mortor car is used by the proprietor for his bussiness and not use by the employee, will there be any FBT. Hope I am putting my ? clear.
quote:
1)any privilege, service, facility or amenity, directly or indirectly, provided by an employer, whether by way of reimbursement or otherwise, to his employees (including former employee or employees);
2)The fringe benefits shall be deemed to have been provided by the employer to his employees, if the employer has, in the course of his business or profession (including any activity whether or not such activity is carried on with the object of deriving income, profits or gains) incurred any expense on,
Question: (1) should there be a necessity to incur exp on employees "or"
(2) with or without employees, will the expenses classified shall be deemed to liable for FBT.
Hope I am putting my ? clear.
Thanks
Manager- Accounts/Tax/Finance
229 Points
Joined September 2007
Because proprietorship concerns are exempted from the net of FBT hence there is no need to pay FBT on any kind of expenses incurred by him.
Professional
78 Points
Joined September 2007
If the firm is the proprietorship firm then there is no question of FBT
Chartered Accountants
55 Points
Joined September 2007
Hi Friends,
FBT Provison is not applicalble for proprietorship concern. Sec(115) has defined the applicability of FBT
Chartered Accountants
55 Points
Joined September 2007
Hi friends i am posting the definitions of fringe benefit tax under
115W. In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,
(a) employer means,
(i) a company;
(ii) a firm;
86[(iii) an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not;]
(iv) a local authority; and
(v) every artificial juridical person, not falling within any of the preceding sub-clauses:
87[Provided that any person eligible for exemption under clause (23C) of section 10 or registered under section 12AA or a political party registered under section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951) shall not be deemed to be an employer for the purposes of this Chapter;]
(b) fringe benefit tax or tax means the tax chargeable under section 115WA
481 Points
Joined March 2007
FBT not applicable to individual doing business in a proprietary form.
Chartered Accountant
157 Points
Joined October 2007
Hai
you have fixed the crux of the matter.
Thus a proprietory concern need not pay FBT even if employees are there.
thanks
ravisankar
Chartered Accountant
157 Points
Joined October 2007
Hai
you have fixed the crux of the matter.
Thus a proprietory concern need not pay FBT even if employees are there.
thanks
ravisankar
Practicing
103 Points
Joined October 2008
Hi Friend,
Wheather Insurance on Car is allowed in the Year of Payment
If Insurance on Car is paid on 1-2-2008 of Rs.12000/- [For period 1-2-2008 To 31-1-2009] wheather it is fully deductible in the year of payment wheather proportinetly deductable in the year 2007-08 2000 and in 2008-09 10000/-
please clarify
Originally posted by :sanjeev |
" |
Because proprietorship concerns are exempted from the net of FBT hence there is no need to pay FBT on any kind of expenses incurred by him. |
" |