it has been held that a mere extension of the house building would not give the benefit to the assessee u/s 54 or 54F. CIT Vs. Pradeep Kumar (2006) 153 Taxman 138 (Mad)
Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies Click here to Login / Register
More recent discussions | Post
Jari Saree Center
New Delhi
Others
AJAY SINGH AND CO LLP
Thane
CA Final
RRPM & Associates LLP
Chennai
CA Inter
SANKARAN & KRISHNAN
B.Com
Srinath Manikanta
Hyderabad
RMA And Associates LLP
pushpganga ventures
Pune
CA
ADY & CO.
Graduate (Any)
India's largest network for finance professionals
Alternatively, you can log in using: