Calculation of Limit u/s 372A of Companies Act

Others 1445 views 5 replies

 

IF Limited (”the subsidiary”)  is a wholly owned subsidiary of IIP Ltd. (“the holding company”), a Company, registered under the  Companies Act. The subsidiary is also registered as a Non Banking Financial Company under the RBI Act. And thus a finance company within the meaning of Sec 372A(8) of the companies Act.

Besides investments in the subsidiary company, the holding company has also made investment is shares of other bodies corporate as per List 1 given below:

 

List 1:

CO1 LTD ((not a subsidiary)

CO2 LTD ((not a subsidiary)

CO3 LTD (another wholly owned subsidiary)

 

The subsidiary company has also made investment is shares of other bodies corporate as per List 2 given below:

 

List 2:

CO4 Ltd ((not a subsidiary)

CO5 Ltd ((not a subsidiary)

 

Now the holding company, IIP Limited, proposes to make invest in shares of another company, New Co Ltd This investment will not make the new company New Co Ltd. a subsidiary.

 

Query:

At the time when IIP Ltd proposes to invest in the shares of New Co Ltd, for determining  the limit u/s 372A of the companies Act, whether the investment made by IIP Ltd in other bodies corporate as per list 1 alone need to be considered (excluding its subsidiaries) or IIP Ltd’s investment as well as investments made by its subsidiary IF ltd in other bodies corporate both need to clubbed together?

 

The reason for the query is due to the fact that Sec 372A starts with “No company shall directly or indirectly…..”

Whether the investment in other bodies corporate by the subsidiary, IF Ltd, would amount to indirect investment by the holding company, IIP Ltd?

 

Seniors / experts may please share their views. Elaborate reply eith proper reasoning expected.

 

Thanks and regards

Sujit Talukder

Replies (5)

Can we discuss this interesting issue please, friends..

I think in the fitness of things and in the spirit of law for calculation of 372A limits, the loan/investment made/given to wholly owned subsidiaries will not be considered.

I m agreed 4m above Expert.

Here indirectly word r used to cover those situation where Co. not borrowed fund 4 itself directly but give security/guarantee 4 a loan taken someone (may be Subsidiarey) from 3rd party. Again u/s 372(A)(8)Any loan made by Holding co. /guarantee or security given by Holding Co. to bits subsidiary is exempt. So investment of both Co. shall be considered seperate & not clubbed together

Dear Nidhi,

Security and guarantee is already covered by the section. The exemption available u/s 372A(8) is for investment by holding co to subsidiary co. Can this be made ground for my query? I think, No. Could you please elaborate further.

Dear Dipjyoti,

My query was related to investment by holding co in another co. Then, whether the investments by its subsidiary in other companies can be clubbed for the purpose of limit calculation?


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register