BOTH THE QUESTIONS FROM WINDING UP WERE OUT OF SYLLABUS.AS INSTITUTE DECLARED THAT ONLY 9.4 FROM YHE INSTITUTE MAT IS IN SYLLABUS>EVERYBODY SHOULD START SENDING MAILS TO PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF STUDIES.PLEASE
Menu
CA Final Law Paper Out of Syllabus
Replies (9)
please give the phone number of president
Yes, Mrinal is right. 16 marks paper was out of syllabus. Both the questions were not from paragraph 9.4.
Send mail to director of Board of Studies at vijaykapur @ icai.org
or file this matter with e-sahayta
MERA REQUEST HAIN AP LOG SABH MATTER KO POST KARE AUR BATE KAM KARE AUR INSTITUTE KO MAIL AND PHONE ZYADA KARE.
hey but as per icai notification dated 22-2-2011 there were no deletion from the corp and allied law syllabus. plz go through this link
https://www.icai.org/new_post.html?post_id=7003&c_id=121
In costing paper also theory of benchmarking is not in new syllabus. . Check out new study material, nowhere it is gvn .institute askd frm old syllabus.
Frnds i have received the correspondense from the icai that they will take adequate measures for this mistake.
I m attaching both my request to icai & ther final reply for ur assurance.
THIS IS MY EMAIL WHICH I SENT THEM---------------------
Respected Sir/Madam,
As per the notice/announcement issued by the Board of Studies(ICAI) for NOV 2010 & MAY 2011 exams following were the provisions applicable for Winding up(Chapter no.9 of study material)
[EXTRACT OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT]
Applicability of relevant Amendments/Circulars/Notifications/Regulations etc. relating to Corporate and Allied Laws for May 2011, Examination:
Companies [relating to Winding Up]
[Students have been advised to study only the general provisions of winding up as covered under Paragraph 9.4 of chapter 9 of the study material]
If we refer the ICAI study material for law regarding chapter no.9 (para 9.4)----then only general provisions are applicable i.e section 528 to 560. BUT THE QUESTIONS WHICH APPEARED IN MAY 2011 LAW PAPERS WERE BASED ON FOLLOWING PROVISIONS
QUESTION NO.2(b)--- IT WAS BASED ON SECTION 428 (CONTRIBUTORIES)-------8 MARKS
QUESTION NO.6(a)--- IT WAS BASED ON SECTION 433(e),434 & 439(5)---------------8 MARKS
SO I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IN SUCH SITUATION WHAT WILL THE STEPS Board of Studies(ICAI) WUD TAKE?? SO THAT STUDENTS ARE NOT KEPT AT A DISADVANTAGEOUS POSITION.
HOPE TO GET SOME POSITIVE RESPONSE.
This mail is sent in the interest of all the CA Final students appeared in May 2011 exams.
Thanks & regards
DHAVAL DESAI (WRO 0257467)
REPLY FROM ICAI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: megha
Date: Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM
Subject: RE: Inapplicable provisions of winding up asked for 16 marks in CA Final(Law paper) May 2011 exams.
To: Dhaval Desai
Dear student,
We have already taken note of this matter and necessary due diligence will be followed during evaluation process.
Regards,
CS. Megha Goel,
Board of Studies,
ICAI.
AS WE DONT GET PAPERS TO CHECK BUT HOPE FOR THE BEST.
DHAVAL DESAI
www.taxpertindia.blogspot.com
u cant take that stand in final that it is out of syallbus and all
so chill out what ever u do it of no use now
Hi frndz.. from my point of view, nothing is out of syllabus.. contributory is what we learnt in PCC Accounts and Bench marking is what we learnt in PCC Strategic Management... so they are expecting CA final students to remember all those things we learnt earlier..
Recent Topics :
- LTCG - SEC54
- Foreign remittance from our client for Co Working
- UDIN generation
- Reply plz guys
- Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number
- Where can students practice XAT PYQs effectively?
- Gst on Guest house 5% without ITC
- How do you collect documents from clients for ITR
- GST ITC on Construction/ Tenant Specific Renovatio
- GST Treatment and Reporting of Share & Mutual
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
