Articleship Duration

nooo.. its very reasonable. well i feel even 3.5 yr is less to learn.. it quite diffficult. bt knwing all in 2 yrs.. nt possible.. thr r many more consdierations..

but considering the amount of stipend paid to students... 3 yrs is a long time to stay on a very less stipend..

many students are facing problems because of it...

 It should be reduced

due to articleship CA course take more time that other professinal courses.

 Agree with abhijit. the amount of stipned is very low.

we work for 8 hrs and receive jst Rs. 1000 PM. in today's world rs. 1000 has no matter

i agree with manish..

and travelling takes atleast 500 of these 1000

and the peons in our offices get atleast 4 times more than this

I KNW.. BT SO FAR AS LEARNING IS CONSIDERED 3 YRS  IS LESS.. STIPEND VARIES.. IT SHUD BE INCREASED.. BT THE TOPIC STARTED FROM THE DURATION NT THE STIPEND AMOUNT...

But ravi learning in our profession goes on and on. it may take our whole life to learn. this doesnt mean we get so long period of articleship.

i agree that it is reasonable . but student should given with training in diff areas . but students are given with same work for three & half years which is not reasonable i guess. what you say

 institute should think about this .......it is really unfair ....

 3.5 years is too much for ca in industry

but way too less for ca who wanna practice.

Coz generally in industry fresh ca has to go through training and all that for the specific process that he will undertake, but practice requires a seasoned professional and i dont think 3.5 years is enough coz it ttakes almost 8-10 months to understand actually whats going on and then we start practicing.