In the following situation please help in identifying SBO-
ABC Private limited has 5 shareholders A holding 2.03% shares B also 2.03% C (Foreigner individual) holding 26.27% D (Foreigner individual) holding 26.33% and PTE ltd(Foreign company) holding 43.34% shares in ;PTE ltd there are 3 shareholders A holding 34 % C 33% and D 33% ..
Kindly advice on the applicability of ben2 on the reporting company ABC Pvt.
Menu
Applicability of BEN 2
Replies (3)
there is no SBO , Since there is no majority stake in pte Ltd ie not holding more than 50 percent of shares
Is indirect holding mandatory? as in the bare act it is given that HOLDS INDIRECTLY OR TOGETHER WITH DIRECT HOLDING NOT LESS THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. In the above sentence the word TOGETHER mandates INDIRECT holding of some percentage?
here in above situation, A,B,C,D have direct holding. in pte limited, A,C,D have indirect holding but does not satisfy the condition majority stake. as there is no indirect holding, the question of sbo does not arise.
Recent Topic
- EFILING ITR2 FROM COMMON FILING UTILITY
- SBI gold bond interest
- PPF Interest Exempt - But what drop down to choose
- Itr2 or itr3 intraday trade 1 loss of 70 paise
- Calculation of IT
- CA FINAL FR IndAS 33 Doubt(Corrected)
- Clarification Needed: Reporting Accrued vs Paid FD
- TDS on prize given to participants in Livestock sh
- TDS related matter - 194 IA
- Research: How do CA firms handle GSTR-2B reconcili
Related Topics
CAclubindia
