A peculiar issue under service tax on rental.

531 views 1 replies

The tenant - a nationalized bank initially paid service tax from June to October 2007. Subsequently stopped ST payments citing Bombay High Court stay order and also recovered whatever ST they paid from subsequent month rent, despite the fact they have taken Cenvat credit based on the invoices given. With effect from July 2009 (retorspective effect) their lease deed was renewed on March 2011, and now the bank volunteers to pay ST but from July 2009 only. I sent a letter to the bank that they should pay the ST from June 2007 with penalties and interests as it was they who have refused to pay citing the High Court stay order and that I cannot accept part-payment from July 2009. Am I right in doing so? Should I or should I not take their ST payment today with effect from July 2009 and keep the ST from June 2007 to June 2008 pending.

Replies (1)

put high court reference or details here to discuss more

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 July 2026
CA Articles

Kinjal H Shah & Co.

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT, CA SemiQualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT , CA SemiQualifie

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
CA Article

Pipara & Co. LLP.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 July 2026
Article Assistant and B.com pass

BANSAL YOGESH AND CO

Gautam Budh Nagar

B.Com

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Semi qualified CA

Garg Bros & Associate CA

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details