A peculiar issue under service tax on rental.

The tenant - a nationalized bank initially paid service tax from June to October 2007. Subsequently stopped ST payments citing Bombay High Court stay order and also recovered whatever ST they paid from subsequent month rent, despite the fact they have taken Cenvat credit based on the invoices given. With effect from July 2009 (retorspective effect) their lease deed was renewed on March 2011, and now the bank volunteers to pay ST but from July 2009 only. I sent a letter to the bank that they should pay the ST from June 2007 with penalties and interests as it was they who have refused to pay citing the High Court stay order and that I cannot accept part-payment from July 2009. Am I right in doing so? Should I or should I not take their ST payment today with effect from July 2009 and keep the ST from June 2007 to June 2008 pending.

Replies (1)

put high court reference or details here to discuss more

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 August 2026
CA Article's

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
18 August 2026
Audit Assistant - Remote / Work From Home

CA ANOOP P K & ASSOCIATES

Kozhikode

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 August 2026
Senior Accountant

MG Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 August 2026
Article Assistant

M/s.S.G.Salecha & Co.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 August 2026
Article Assistant CA Articleship

Eshwar & Co Chartered Accountants - Nungambakkam

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 August 2026
Article Assistant

Suraj Garg and Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 August 2026
Deputy Manager - Finance

RoamPrime Technologies Private Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 August 2026
Article Assistant

N J Suresh & Associates

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details