295, 372A

1. If a public company accept unsecured loan from its shareholders without complying the provisions of section 58A and Deposit rules, 1975 then there is contraventon of section 58A. Section 372A has no role to play.

 

2. Section 295 is applicable in this case.

Regards

Dear Rajesh,

 

1) Yes, its a contravention of 58A if shareholder is an individual.(not if corporate).

2) depend on conditions referred in 295(1) (a) to (d)

Dear Rajesh,

 

1. Public company can accept deposit from its shareholders, subject to the provisions of section 58A and Acceptance of Deposit Rules, 1975. and subject to the limit of 10 % of its paid up capital and reserves.

 

2.Yes section 295 will be applicable.

However, secdtion 295 would not apply in the following case:-

1. if the lending company is a Private Company

2.Loan is given by holding company to its subsidiary

3.guarantee is given in relation to loan to its subsidiary.

As per Ramaiya: page 618: As per Rule 2(b) (ix) of Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 also exempts deposits received from directors by public/ private companies or from its shareholders by a private company, if they had not made deposits out of borrowed funds. As per my understood that, a private company can accept the deposits from its directors as well as members, whereas public company can accept deposits from only its directors and not individual members. In above case, the transaction may be treated as inter corporate deposits (because transaction between two companies), hence, the section 58A do not attracted, however section 372A should be complied. If I am wrong, kindly enlighten me….

Dear Vannan Ji,

 

As per Rule 2(b)(ix) of Acceptance of Deposit Rules, 1975

"any amount received from a person who, at the time of the receipt of hte amount ,was a Director of a Company or any amount received from a relative of a director or its member by a Private Company.

Thus in case of Public Company deposit from Directors are exempted Deposit.

In case of Private Company, can only accept deposit form its Directors, Shareholders and their relatives as per section 3(1)(iii) and as per the above rule deposit from all of them is a exempted deposit. Thus, provision of deposit would not apply and in each case it would be unsecured loan.