Order Passed under sec 143(3) is not valid in the absence of service of notice under sec 143(2) and AO must give proper findings on the order
Last updated: 02 January 2012
Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
Ld. CIT (Appeal) is not justified in law and facts and circumstances of the case in holding the order passed under section 143(3) as valid without proving the valid service of notice under section 143(2) with in the limitation period of 12 months as per proviso 143(2) under the circumstances when receipt of notice is denied by the Appellant Company and service of notice is not confronted to the appellant company inspite of request made.
Citation :
Adarsh Kanch Udyog Pvt. Ltd.,Coal Siding Road,Firozabad (UP)-283203(Appellant)vs. Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(2),Central Revenue Building,New Delhi(PAN: AACCA5631N) (Respondent)
You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :
Stay updated! Stay ads free
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Original Price : INR 2999/-
Offer Price : INR 1999/-
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Know More
Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 2745
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
