File Content - 
		 Cost management in Indian Industry:                             
Banking , Healthcare and Construction Industry 
 
 
 
 
Contributors: Sanjukta Sen, Manushi Sharma, Nidhi Gupta, Nikita Sarawagi, Richa Sharma, Shreyasi 
Bannerjee (PGDM Program Students-Birla Institute of Management Technology, Noida) 
 
 
 
 
  
Project Guide: CMA Pankaj Jain, President-Indian Society of Management Accountants www.cmaonline.in   
Project Co-ordinator: Dr L. Ramani, Associate Professor-BIMTECH www.bimtech.ac.in
Page 1 of 37 
 
 
Table of Contents 
 
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 
Usage of Cost Management Tools in India ......................................................................................... 3 
Current Use of Cost Management tools ............................................................................................. 4 
Cost Management and Profitability in Banks...................................................................................... 5 
Need for Cost Management and Profitability in Banks ....................................................................... 6 
Challenges Before Bank Management ............................................................................................... 7 
Cost Management in Healthcare Industry .......................................................................................... 9 
The benefits and limitations of using traditional ABC for strategy management  
........................................................................................................................................................ 10 
Operational Advantages of ABC ....................................................................................................... 11 
Strategic Benefits of ABC ................................................................................................................. 13 
About the Balance Scorecard (BSC)  ................................................................................................. 14 
Using the BSC with ABC for Strategic Cost Management .................................................................. 16 
Potential Uses of Combined Model for Strategic Control ................................................................. 17 
Role of Costing in Healthcare Industry  ............................................................................................ 21 
Cost Management in Construction Industry  .................................................................................... 23 
Public Private Partnership Model ..................................................................................................... 25 
Real Estate Development Model  ..................................................................................................... 26 
Construction Involving In house Fabrication and Manufacturing ...................................................... 27 
Nature of Cost Accounting Records for Construction Industry.......................................................... 30 
Project Costing Methodology .......................................................................................................... 32 
Applicability of Cost Accounting Standards (CAS)  ............................................................................ 35
Page 2 of 37 
 
 
 
INTRODUCTION 
 
=n  today’s  time  of  rapid  technological  change,  tough  global  and  domestic  competition,  total 
cost  management  is  central  to  sustained  corporate  profitability  and  competitiveness.  The 
management  mantra  today  is  conquering  your  costs,  before  they  conquer  you.  The  cost 
means total  cost  to the  customer.  The  cost  leadership  strategy  does  not  mean  compromise 
on either quality or technology or product differentiation. Low costs are no advantage, if the 
customers  are  not  willing  to  buy  the  product  of  low  cost  firm.  Cost  management has  to  be 
driven with customer as the focus. 
 
The  survival  triplet  today  for  any  company  is  how  to  manage  its  product/service  cost, 
quality,  and  performance.  The  customers  are  continuously  demanding  high  quality  and 
better  performance  products/services  and  at  the  same  time,  they  want  the  prices  to  fall. 
The shareholders are also demanding a required rate of return on their investment with the 
company.  Thus,  cost  has  become  a  residual.  The  challenge  is  being  able  to  manufacture  or 
provide  service  within  the stipulated  cost  framework.  Thus,  cost  management  has  to  be  an 
ongoing continuous improvement programme. 
 
Today  the  market  leaders  are  even  pursuing  cost-reduction  as  a  strategic  imperative.  They 
want to stay ahead of the market by continuously widening the gap between their  cost and 
that of their competitors and re-deploy the resources for profitable growth. 
 
Thus,  the  cost  challenge  is  one  of  the  most  critical  tasks  facing  Indian  Industry  during  the 
next  decade  in  the  post-WTO  environment.  The  framework  will  be  of  activity-based costing 
(ABC) and performance management in a value chain perspective.
Page 3 of 37 
 
 
Firms using activity-based costing system are: 
a) More likely to have a: 
i) Better insight for benchmarking and budgeting; 
ii) Clear structure of priorities of budget goal; 
iii)  Clarity  of  reasons  for  effective  implementation  of  planning;  and  budgeting Process in 
their organization; 
iv) Successful  in  capturing  accurate  cost  information  for  value  chain  analysis  and  supply 
chain analysis and 
 
b) Less likely to use 
i) department-wide budgeting systems, 
ii) Absorption costing systems, and 
iii) Variable costing systems vis-à-vis the firms that follow traditional costing system. 
 
Usage of cost management tools in India 
Cost-volume-profit analysis 
Material Requirement Planning (MRP) 
Activity-based budgeting 
Business Process Reengineering (BPR) 
Value engineering 
Just in Time 
Target costing 
Strategic positioning analysis 
Kaizen budgeting 
Kaizen costing 
Life cycle budgeting 
Quality costing 
Taguchi Costing 
 (Source: Cost management practices in India-An empirical study)
Page 4 of 37 
 
 
Current use of management tools 
Transfer pricing practices 
The  Indian  corporate  sector  had  followed  market  price  based  transfer  pricing  system  as 
against  the  worldwide  practice  of  cost-based method  domestic  transfer  pricing  and  market 
price  based  method  for  international  transfer. The  motivations  for  adoption  of  market 
based domestic  transfer  pricing  method have  been  attributed  to optimal  decision  making 
for the organization, divisional autonomy, and motivation for performance. 
 
Manufacturing overheads accounting 
The use  of  direct method of allocation  of service  departments' overheads cost amongst the 
production  departments  is  widespread.  In India,  too  the  direct  method  was found  to  be 
widely used to  allocate  support department  overheads  cost  amongst  the  production 
department  in  the  first  stage  of  cost allocation.  Surprisingly  the  reciprocal  method,  the 
theoretically  more  sound method  of cost  allocation,  does not  find  much  acceptance  with 
corporate India and was not at all popular worldwide. 
 
The  department-wide  machine  hour  rate  had  been  found  to  be  more  popular  with 
corporate  India vis-à-vis department  wide  comprehensive  machine  hour  rate.  The  practice 
of corporate  India  with  respect  to  treatment  of  under/over-absorbed  overheads  was  in 
agreement with the generally accepted cost accounting principles.  
 
Standard costing 
The  standard  costing  technique  as  a  part  of  the  management  control  systems  had been 
widely  used  amongst  corporate  India. The  Indian  practice  is  in  agreement  with  that  of  the 
U.S.A. No significant difference in the use of standard costing amongst ABC users and non- 
ABC users were found.
Page 5 of 37 
 
 
As  per  studies,  the  sales  volume  variance  and  selling  price  variance  had  been  given  the 
highest level  of  importance  over  the  other  variances.  This  had  been  followed  in  material 
price and material usage variance. 
 
On  an  aggregate  basis, material  variances  had  been  given  more  predominance over 
overhead  variances  but  when  the  sample  was discriminated  in  to  ABC  user/nonuser; it  had 
been  found  that  ABC  users  were  more  concerned  about  overhead  variances than  the  non-
users. 
 
Cost  management and  budgetary  planning  &  control had  evolved to  be  the  major 
motivations for implementation  of standard costing in the organizations. The ABC users had 
indicated  performance  measurement  as  significantly  higher motivation  for  implementation 
of standard costing vis-à-vis non-ABC users. 
 
COST MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY IN BANKS 
 
Banking situation overview: 
The  concept  of  banking  business  over  the  decades  has  changed  quite  a  lot.  It's  no  longer 
merely  their  traditional  twin  streams  of  activities  of  accepting  deposits  and  lending  to  the 
needy.  With  the  wafer  thin  contribution  from  the  staple  diet  of  interest  income,  banks  are 
forced  to  look  for  earning  other  income  through  commissions,  brokerages,  profits  from 
investments  etc  to  remain  profitable.  Also  the  growing  competition  and  complexity  of  the 
changing  banking  situations  are  compelling  Banks  for  innovating complex  products, 
adapting  new  channels  for  such  innovative  product  deliveries  and  following  new  business 
processes investing huge capital resources.
Page 6 of 37 
 
 
NEED FOR COST MANAGEMENT & PROFITABILITY IN BANKS: 
 Banks  earn  profit  when  its  business  costs  and  expenses  are  less  than  its  revenues  through 
its  services  and  investments.  Any  business  for  that  matter  survives  only  if  it  earns  profits. 
Although  Banking  is  considered  as  a  bloodline  of  economy  of  a  nation,  to  provide  a 
reasonable  return  for  the  above-cited huge  capital  expenditures  and  to  remain  servicing 
any economy, profitability of the banks is a must. To remain profitable, 'efficient & effective 
cost  management'  of  its  entire  operations  is  the  need  of  the  day  for  the  banking  sector. 
Besides  this  basic  need  of  earning  profit  for  survival,  contrary  to  other  business  activities, 
the banks are  uniquely positioned to face many constraints to earn even  normal  profits for 
its services. The following are some of the bottlenecks the banks have to circumvent to earn 
profits:  
1) most of the Banks are predominantly regulated by respective Governments to serve their 
national  objectives  like  food  production,  rural  development,  health,  education  etc.  Banks 
lend  their  borrowed  funds  to  other  borrowers  with  needs  spread  across  different  time 
periods.  Since  banks  rely  on  borrowed  money,  they  need  to  raise  resources  in  a  matching 
manner  to  avoid  the  risk  of  asset-liability  mismatch.  At  the  systemic  level  often  banks  face 
small  gaps  in  their  matching  maturity  profiles  of  their  resources  due  to  frequent  change  in 
regulatory provisions. 
2) Banking business involves greater risk than many other businesses owing to its nature of 
commodity of transactions-money. 
3)  The  increased  range  and  complexity  of  bank  operations  calls  for sophisticated  risk 
management  systems  and  techniques,  planning  tools  and  processes  that  demands 
additional capital. 
4)  Business  expansion  and  implementation  of  Basel-II  accord  are  forcing  Banks  to  shore  up 
capital resources. 
5) Burgeoning NPAs in the books of Banks drain the precious resources of the Banks by way 
of  prudential  provisioning  for  bad  assets  that  is  the  banks  chief  scourge.  
6)  Customer  driven  competitive  environment- Customers  are  less  loyal  and  demand 
immaculate service delivery.
Page 7 of 37 
 
 
7)  Competition  from  post  offices  and  non-bank  technology  companies  due  to  onset  of  e-
commerce with extensive intermediation. 
8) Growing interest rates strain the interest spreads. 
9) Economies of scale to support new products and services. 
 
Challenges before Bank Management: 
1)  Banks  need  to  retain  their  existing  customers  and  widen  their  base  developing  a  retail 
strategy  and  geographical  capabilities  to  focus  on  the  customer  satisfaction,  improve 
product  sales  and  delivery  qualitatively  adhering  to  regulatory  frame  work. 
2)  Banks  have  to  develop  an  effective  strategy  and  management  tools  to  ensure  cost 
effective  straight  through  processing  and  seamless  end-to-end  business  processing  by 
leveraging  technology  for  real  time  performance  management  capabilities  enabling  link 
between actual business performance and business plans. 
3)After  the  recent  melt  down  of  the  western  economies  like  USA  which  saw  some  of  the 
biggest  and  supposedly  “safest”  names  in  international  banking  like  Bear  Sterns,  Lehman 
Brothers, Merrill Lynch and HBOS on both sides of Atlantic keel over, the confidence level of 
investing  public  in  banking  is  at  low  ebb.  Therefore  earning  legitimate  profits  in  a 
transparent  and  fair  manner  managing  inherent  risk  factors  for  ultimate  survival  is  a  big 
challenge. 
4) The range of banking products is ever changing with lesser and lesser margins; but cost of 
infrastructure and operating costs are growing exponentially. 
5) Developing new revenue streams and pricing competitively. 
Conclusion:  
It  is  easier  said  than  done.  It  all  again  depends  upon  the  level  of  organizational  maturity, 
management  skills,  resource  strength  and  business  plans  of  each  bank  to  evolve  their  own 
cost  management  and  profit  making  strategies  carefully  prioritizing  each  step  of  their 
activity.
Page 8 of 37 
 
 
In  the  current  economic  environment,  one  clear  critical  success  factor  for  Banks  is  a  strong 
emphasis  on  expense  management  throughout  the  Banks.  Although  other  critical  success 
factors- such  as  quality,  dependability,  relationship  building  and  convenience- are  always 
worthy of attention, an emphasis on controlling expenses trumped all other factors. 
 
The  aim  of  cost  accounting  in  a  bank  is  to  provide  uniform  account  allocation  within  the 
financial  accounting  system,  which,  in  turn,  affords  comprehensive  and  transparent  cost 
allocation  to  cost  centres,  provides  detailed  costing  information  and  complements  existing 
controlling  components  within  the  value  area.  This  is  an  important  principle  on  the  way  to 
creating a comprehensive P&L, profit centre and business unit accounting process. 
 
To  achieve  these  objectives,  banks draft  the  pertinent  account  allocation  guidelines 
(categorisation, prioritisation and allocation of all business transactions) and develop a cost-
type  plan  based  on  the  financial  accounting.  As a result,  banks facilitate  documentation  of 
all cost types within the bank as well as their subsequent allocation to cost centres.  
 
Benefits 
 Uniform booking and allocation of costs (account allocation guidelines) 
 Definition and consideration of imputed costs 
 Cost monitoring (target-actual analysis) 
 Transparency in terms of cost reduction potential, increased operational efficiency 
 Enhanced information base providing efficient bank controlling.
Page 9 of 37 
 
 
 
COST MANAGEMENT IN HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY 
The  idea  of  creating  a  link  between  activities,  costs,  and  strategic  objectives  can  be  applied 
to  any  situation  in  different  industries  and  contexts  that  requires  a  strategic  perspective  of 
costs.  
 
Now  we  try to  develop strategic cost  management  practices which  could  be adopted  in  the 
Healthcare/Pharma Industry of India. There are two reasons for selecting this milieu: 
 
First,  there  appears  to  be  the  need  for  a  practical  strategic  management  tool  that  can 
connect  the  medical,  business,  and  public  service  dimensions  of  strategic  objectives  in 
healthcare.  While  the  achievement  of  strategic  objectives  is  important  in  any  organization, 
in  the  healthcare  sector  these  objectives  usually  have  broader  implications  beyond  the 
impact on an individual organization. Despite this, the healthcare sector has been especially 
slow in adopting of the strategic management paradigm. One possible reason for this slower 
adoption  could  be  the  absence  of  a  tool  that  provides  the  multi-dimensional  focus  that  the 
sector  needs.  Another  reason  could  be  the  absence  of  an  illustration  of  how  a  business 
system could be useful in the non-profit domain.  
 
Secondly,  the  healthcare  service  of  patient  education  plays  an  important  role  in  the 
management  and  control  of  various  diseases.  There  is widespread  acceptance  in  academic 
and practitioner  literature about the  importance  of patient education and  large amounts of 
resources  are  invested  in  education  programs.  However  patient  education  (especially  in 
chronic diseases) is absent from discussions in the literature about the costing of healthcare 
services. The  objectives  of  healthcare education  programs,  such  as  creating  awareness  of 
the  disease  and  ensuring  patients  lead  productive  lives,  cannot  be  subordinated  to  cost 
control for its own sake. Therefore, using a strategic cost management model that manages 
costs, without adversely affecting the goals of patient education, would be appropriate.
Page 10 of 37 
 
 
 
The  study  presents  the  development  of  a  strategic  cost  management  model  in  the  Pharma 
Industry  that  combines  activity-based  costing  with  principles  of  the  balanced  scorecard 
(BSC).  The  purpose  of  the  combined  ABC/BSC  model  is  to  provide  cost  information  that 
could  be  used  to  evaluate  strategy  implementation,  monitor  premises  underlying  strategy 
that may need to be revised, and provide a strategic perspective to operational decisions.  
 
While  ABC  provides  activity-specific  cost  information,  the  BSC  framework  of  different 
performance  perspectives  (or  activity  dimensions)  provides  structure  to  data  collection and 
organization, and  facilitates strategic analysis. A model,  overlaying the BSC over ABC, would 
link  activities  and  their  costs  to  the  strategic  objectives  of  an  education  program  (for 
example,  prevention  of  complications  and  optimization  of  quality  of  life).  Based  on  this 
information about the strategic impact of activities, operational cost management decisions, 
resource  allocation,  and  process  improvements  could  be  implemented  so  as  to  maximize 
congruence  with  strategic  goals.  The  model  could  therefore be  used  to  evaluate  whether 
operational  realities  reflect  strategic  plans,  by  showing  where  resources  are  being 
expended. Such a combined model that contributes to the achievement of strategic goals is 
a valuable strategic cost management tool.  
 
The  combined  model  could  also  be  used  to  obtain  information  to  reassess  strategic 
objectives.  The  model  could  indicate  variations  in  resource  consumption  thereby  directing 
attention  to  changes  in  the  strategic  environment,  or  highlight  whether  assumptions 
underlying the strategic choice are valid in reality. These issues could manifest themselves in 
the combined model through variations between expectations and actualities.  
 
The benefits and limitations of using traditional ABC for strategy management  
In this section the following points are discussed – (i) the operational advantages of ABC, (ii) 
the strategic benefits of ABC, and (iii) the strategic limitations of ABC. The literature in these
Page 11 of 37 
 
 
areas supports the development of a strategic cost management model, and the use of ABC 
as a critical element within the model.  
 
 Operational advantages of ABC  
ABC  has  significant  advantages  over  its  predecessor,  standard  costing.  Standard  costing  is 
driven  by  volume  measures  such  as  number  of  production  units or  number  of  machine 
hours,  and  uses  a  predetermined  (“standard”)  cost  rate  per  unit  to  assign  overhead  costs 
(such  as  product  design,  and  administrative  costs)  and  evaluate  performance.  Standard 
costing thus assumes a direct relationship between overhead resource consumption by each 
unit  of  output,  which  has  been  shown  to  be  unrealistic.  Standard  costing  techniques  are 
also  based  on  work  standards  and  standard  costs  that  follow  a  top-down  flow  from 
management  to  line  employees.  Valuable  problem-solving  skills  and  process  improvement 
insights from frontline employees may thus be lost, making these approaches inappropriate 
for strategic performance management.  
 
A  link  is  established  between  resources  and  activities,  and  between  activities  and  cost 
objects, by  identifying  appropriate  cost  and  activity  drivers.  These  are  factors  that  cause  an 
increase  in  cost  or  activity  consumption.  By  using  volume  of  output,  employee  time, 
complexity,  and  other  factors  as  possible  drivers  of  costs,  ABC  estimates  costs  more 
accurately. Also,  by providing realistic information about activities, their costs, their drivers, 
and  how  they  link  to  form  processes,  ABC  can  provide  information  for  activity-based 
management  (ABM),  i.e.  decision  making  based  on  an  understanding  of  costs and  cost 
drivers, which can be managed and improved upon. For example, cost information obtained 
from an ABC system for a patient education program can also be used to evaluate the effect 
of changes in the system, such as providing certain modules of instruction via digital media.  
 
The  insights  provided  by  a  multi-driver  ABC  system  can  be  very  valuable  to  service 
organizations  since  almost  all  operating  expenses  in  the  service  sector  vary  due  to  factors 
other than volume. For example, if hospital inpatient costs are driven by multiple cost
Page 12 of 37 
 
 
drivers,  but are allocated based on a single  driver, the reported cost and,  consequently, the 
reimbursement  to  hospitals  by  insurers are hugely  distorted.  Scholars  have  further  noted 
that ABC is most useful in situations where there are large, increasing expenses especially  
 
for  indirect  and  support  resources,  or  where  there  is  high  diversity – with  a  variety  of 
products, services and customers, or a combination of these variables. 
 
For examples of patient education costs that are  not driven by volume, consider the cost of 
maintenance  of  the  building  in  which  patient  education  is  provided,  or  of  maintaining 
computer systems. These are examples of overhead costs that are incurred to run a  patient 
education program effectively, but are not directly proportional to the number of clients. So 
allocating  these  costs  based  on  client  volume  alone  would  provide  inaccurate  cost 
estimates.  
 
The  ABC  approach  is  therefore  well-suited  to  a  cost  object  such  as  a patient  education 
program,  where  the  relationship  between  number  of  patients  (i.e.  volume)  and  costs  is  not 
always linear. 
 
Patient  education  is  also  a  suitable  candidate  for  ABC  due  to  the  rapidly  increasing  number 
and  changing  demographics  of  persons  diagnosed with  chronic  diseases,  and  the  wide 
variety of personalized services that are provided in these programs.  
 
Studies  have  discussed  the  applicability  and  issues  in  implementation  of  ABC  in  various 
settings,  such as  manufacturing,  financial  services and  healthcare. Though  the  goals  of  for-
profit  and  non-profit  organizations  are  different  by  definition,  the  literature  does  not  show 
that  ABC  is  any  less  applicable  in  the  non-profit  sector,  though  the  decisions  the  ABC 
information is used for may differ.
Page 13 of 37 
 
 
 Some  real-world  examples  of  ABC  being  used  in  the  non-profit  sector  are  seen  in  various 
departments in the Texas state government (Office of the Texas Comptroller, 2001). The use 
of  ABC  for  operational  cost  analysis  is  therefore  well-established.  However,  scholars 
contend  that  such  cost  analysis  must  be  supplemented  by  strategic  analysis  in  order  to 
understand the true nature of a business problem or situation.  
 
Strategic benefits of ABC  
Strategic  uses  of  control  systems,  including  accounting  systems, have  been  discussed  in  the 
academic literature.  
 
ABC  can  be  used  to  influence  how  strategy  is  formulated.  Some  suggested  uses  of  ABC 
during  strategy  formulation  include  pricing  decisions,  supplier  selection,  customer 
profitability analysis, product design and development, and cost reduction. 
  
Information  from  ABC  could  also  impact  the  strategy  process  during  the  implementation 
and monitoring stages. ABC explicitly lists activities carried out in an organizational unit, and 
then  allocates  resource  costs  to  the  activities.  This  information  could  be  analyzed  to 
determine  the  relative  importance  of  specific  activities  to  the  achievement  of  strategic 
objectives,  and  the  associated  costs.  Resources  could  then  be  managed  to  better  reflect 
organizational  strategy.  ABC  would  thus  help  strategy  implementation  by  relating  activities 
to  goals,  indicating  contradictions  between  goals  and  resource  consumption,  and 
highlighting  where  improvements  can  be  made.  An  ABC  system  could  also  be  used  to 
monitor  an  organization’s strategic  environment.  Variations  between  plans  and  actual 
performance  could  draw  attention  to  changes  in  circumstances  that  call  for  a  change  in 
strategic objectives, and the way they are implemented.  
 
The  strategic  value  of  ABC  in  healthcare,  which  is  the  context  of  the  current  study,  is  now 
discussed  further.  Some  researchers  feel  that  increasing  the  visibility  of  activities  may  not 
automatically lead to better strategic control – especially in. In this sector administrative
Page 14 of 37 
 
 
control (i.e.  bureaucratic  powers)  and  collegial  control  (i.e.  domination  of  the  medical 
profession)  must  co-exist  with  ambiguous  boundaries,  and  yet  at odds. Knowledge-sharing 
between different clinical functions may occur ad hoc, without an established administrative 
protocol for such  interaction being in place which makes such activities hard to identify and 
control.  
However,  given  the  increasing  pressure  of  resource  scarcity  in  the  healthcare  sector, some 
means  of  directing  activity  from  the  cost  control  perspective  becomes  necessary. It  is 
suggested  that “closer  integration  of  bureaucratic  and  collegial  control  mechanisms” is  a 
good  way  to fulfil this  necessity,  and  that  greater  visibility  of  activities  will  result,  at  a 
minimum,  in  attempts  to  modify  behaviour  that  affects  strategic  goal  achievement.  ABC 
models  facilitate  such  integration,  as  they  link  costs,  which  in  this  case  are  the  form  of 
administrative  control,  to  the  activities  needed  to  provide  healthcare  services  to  clients, 
which are largely the domain of medical practitioners.  
Strategic limitations of ABC  
ABC,  though  not  used  to  monitor  and  reassess  strategy,  is  considered  to  be  an  important 
component  of strategic cost management and a useful strategic analysis tool. However, it is 
not  powerful  enough  to  be  used  as  the  primary  tool  for  this  purpose.  Therefore,  some 
means  or  criteria  for  evaluating  the  short-term  and  long-term  strategic  implications  of 
control  based  on  activity  analysis  are  needed.  This  leads  directly  into  the  reasons  for 
incorporating  the  BSC  into  a  combined  strategic  model  that  can  explicitly  link  costs  to 
strategic objectives.  
The strategic focus that BSC can provide to ABC  
This  section  begins  with  a  brief  discussion  about  the  development  and  uses  of  a  BSC, 
followed  by  the  how  the  BSC  can  be  useful  in  a  strategic  cost  management  model,  and 
finally,  the  modifications  that  are  necessary  for  using  the  BSC  dimensions  for  strategic  cost 
management in a specific context.  
 About the Balanced scorecard  
The  BSC  is  a  performance  management  tool  that  addresses  the  agency  theory  concern  of 
implementation of legitimate stakeholders’ concerns, and acts as a governance mechanism
Page 15 of 37 
 
 
by aligning agency performance measures with the principal’s. These values are represented 
in  the  BSC  by  the  organization’s  strategic  objectives.  The  BSC  links  performance  at various 
levels to overall strategic objectives by –  
∼ Identifying different important areas or  perspectives of performance that an organization 
must  excel  at  for  strategic  success.  These  usually  relate  to  financial  goals,  customer  needs, 
internal  processes,  and  employee  abilities,  but  can  be  modified  to  reflect  a  specific 
organizational reality.  
∼ Identifying  specific,  quantifiable  measures  or  performance  indicators  within  each 
dimension  of  performance.  These  can  be  financial  or  non-financial  in  nature,  and  are 
identified based on strategic objectives.  
∼ Setting  targets  for  each  of  the  identified  measures.  Individual  and  business  unit 
performance  can  then  be  evaluated  by  comparing  achievement  of  these  targets.  Areas  for 
improvement can be identified based on variance between targets and actual measures.  
 
The  BSC  thus  provides  a  unified,  strategic  focus  to  individual  and  organizational 
performance,  and  communicates  strategy  at  all  organizational  levels  by  providing 
performance targets that are consistent with strategy. 
 
Cascading  scorecards  can  be  constructed  at  different  levels,  flowing  from  the  organization, 
to  a  business  unit,  to  a  department,  to  a  work  team,  to  each  individual.  By  measuring 
selected,  strategically  consistent  outcomes  at  all  levels,  strategy  can  be  communicated 
effectively.  The  BSC  thus  acts  as  a  coherent  strategy  management  system,  by  translating 
strategy  into  performance  measures  and  targets,  and  communicating  and  enforcing  a 
consistent strategy through the organization.  
 
The  next  step is  to  discuss  the  adaptation  of  BSC’s  strengths  to  ABC  and  strategic  cost 
management.
Page 16 of 37 
 
 
 
 
Using the BSC with ABC for strategic cost management  
Scholars  have  discussed  how  ABC  complements  the  BSC  by  providing  information  for 
performance  measurement  and the  synergistic  effect  of  the  two  systems  on  company 
performance. 
 
The  two  reasons  presented  in  this  research  to  support  the  use  of  the  BSC  framework  with 
ABC,  in  a  combined  strategic  cost  management  model  are – (i)  to  ensure  the  completeness 
of  activity  information  by  providing  structure  and,  (ii)  to  promote  a  strategic  view  of  costs. 
These are discussed below in more detail.  
 
As  the  complexity  of  operations  increases,  ABC  tends  to  become  time-consuming  and 
expensive  to  implement  and  maintain.  To  overcome  this  problem,  activity  dimensions  can 
be used as a framework to collect, classify, and organize activity information.  
 
One of the problems faced in strategic cost management is that no tool or method exists to 
connect  strategic  costing  principles  with  their  implementation  at  the  operational  level. A 
strategic  cost  management  tool  could  create  this  link  by  taking  advantage  of  the  BSC 
principle  that  allows  it  to  relate  day-to-day  performance  to  achievement  of  strategic  goals 
.By clearly defining the goals of an organization (or organizational unit), and then identifying 
the  different  dimensions  of  activity  and  activity  costs  that are  directed  towards  that 
purpose, an explicit link can be created. 
 
In order for a combined ABC/BSC model to have true strategic value, the activity dimensions 
chosen for the model must reflect the specific context in which the model will be used. This 
issue is addressed in the following section.
Page 17 of 37 
 
 
 
Modifying performance dimensions to match strategic objectives 
 The  model  can  link  each  activity  dimension  and  individual  activity  to  a  specific  strategic 
objective.  Here,  the  activity  information  is  the  contribution  of  ABC,  while  the  activity 
dimensions  and  link  to  strategy  are  provided  by  the  BSC.  The  ABC  process  can  provide  the 
cost  associated  with  each  activity.  We  can  then  evaluate  the  resource  consumption 
associated with the strategic contribution  of activities and activity dimensions. For instance, 
some activities in the internal business process dimension, such as attending staff meetings 
and maintaining accounts, do not appear to link directly to any particular strategic objective.  
 
They are still necessary components of the business but, due to their non-strategic nature, it 
might  be  possible  to  control  the  amount  of  resources  such  activities  consume,  without 
affecting the achievement of strategic objectives.  
 
The  next  section  of  the  study  discusses  in  more  detail  how  a  combined  ABC/BSC  cost 
management model can be used for strategic control.  
 
 Potential uses of a combined model for strategic control  
 
Ensuring  cost  control  without  affecting  non-cost  strategic goals  could  be  crucial,  especially 
in  sectors  such  as  public  service  and  healthcare  where  strategic  outcomes  have  socio-
economic  implications.  By  overlaying  ABC  and  BSC  principles,  a  combined  model  provides 
cost information,  identifies the amount of resources particular activities consume, and links 
activities  and  resource  consumption  to  the  achievement  of  strategic  objectives.  Cost 
management  decisions  using  the  model  could  therefore  be  driven  by  more  long-term 
considerations, rather than cost minimization for its own sake.  
 
Based on the literature, two strategic uses of a combined strategic cost management model 
are identified. These are (i) to evaluate strategy implementation, by providing information
Page 18 of 37 
 
 
 
about  the  impact  of  decisions  already  taken,  and  (ii)  to  monitor  the  premises  on  which 
strategy is based, and provide information that could affect future strategic decision.  
 
Evaluation of strategy implementation (Feedback role)  
The  model  could  be  used  to  evaluate  strategy  implementation  by  using  activity  and  cost 
information to show how activities relate to strategy, and what resources they consume. By 
showing where resources are being expended, in relation to strategy, a combined model can 
provide feedback about whether a strategy is being implemented as planned.  
 
Monitoring the strategic environment (Feedforward role)  
A combined  model  could  draw  attention  to  critical  events  that  require  a  change  in  the  way 
strategy  has  been  created  or  implemented;  assumptions  that  are  not  valid  in  the  current 
environment;  or  factors  that  may  not  have  been  originally  considered  in  the  strategic 
planning  process.  These  events  or  factors  may  make  themselves known  through  distortions 
or  variations in  activity  time  and  cost  estimates  obtained  from  the  cost  model.  This 
information  can  then  be  used  to  make  adjustments  to  implementation  or  to  the  strategy 
itself.  
 
While  cost  information  has  traditionally  been  used  to  evaluate  the  internal  efficiency  of 
organizations,  the  use  of  such  accounting  information  and  controls  to  influence  strategic 
purposes  such  as  customer  satisfaction,  employee  learning  and  improvement  in  activities 
has been criticized as misleading due to its rigidity and narrow scope  
 
The discussion  now  moves  to  the  context  in  which  the  combined  ABC/BSC  model  is 
presented – healthcare and patient education.
Page 19 of 37 
 
 
Strategic management in healthcare  
Strategic  management  is  very  important  for  healthcare  organizations  because  of  the 
constantly changing environment they operate in. The literature recognising this need and  
 
discussing  the  role  of  strategy  in  healthcare  organizations  can  be  broadly  categorized  as  (i) 
studies about internally focused, long-range operational and planning, (ii) studies discussing 
the  importance  of  an  externally  focused,  long-range  strategic  and  (iii)  studies  presenting 
strategic tools and sources of strategic information in healthcare. 
 
Internally focused long-range planning  
There  is  a  body  of  empirical  and  a  priori research  focusing  on  strategic  ways  to  realize 
effective  internal  operations  in  healthcare.  Some  examples  include  strategic  brokerage  (i.e. 
the  integration  of  diverse  non-clinical  support  services  to  ensure  effective  operation  of 
clinical  activities),  retention  of  nursing  staff  through  improved  work  life,  use  of  operations 
research  techniques  for  strategic  resource  allocation  in  hospitals, cost  control  through 
outsourcing and  the  relationship  between  strategic  orientation  and  level  of  diversity 
management.  
 
These  internally  oriented  studies  tend  to  focus  on  the  aspects  of  healthcare  organizations 
that  do  not  deal  directly  with  the  provision  of  clinical  services  but  are  important  facilitators 
of  the  core  services,  and  achievement  of  strategic  goals.  A  strategic  management  tool  that 
ensures  that  the  strategic  role  of  operational  factors  (both  clinical  and  non-clinical)  is  not 
overlooked  would  therefore  be  useful,  especially  if  it  can  also  identify  activities  that 
consume resources without contributing to achievement of strategic objectives.  
 
 Externally-oriented strategic planning 
 
Researchers  have  also  discussed  the  role  and  importance  of  strategic  planning  and 
management in healthcare. For example,  the importance of the various stages in the
Page 20 of 37 
 
 
strategic process (including implementation and continuous monitoring) in health services; a 
hospital’s  strategic  competencies  (i.e.  the  ability  to  deliver  superior  services  resulting  in 
competitive  advantage)  are  positively  related  to  financial  performance;  hospital  executives 
are attempting to overcome traditional barriers to new  ideas, and implement new strategic 
philosophies  such  as  total  quality  management  and  business  process  re-engineering  in 
healthcare;  strategic  relationships  between  hospitals  and physicians  using  a  transaction 
economics perspective.  
 
These  studies  indicate  that  there  is  an  increasing  interest  in  strategic  management  in 
healthcare.  However,  though  most  hospitals  tend  to  have  internally-focused  planning 
systems  in  place,  not  many  have  strategic  planning  systems  that  are  externally-oriented, 
proactively  attempting  to  understand  the  changing  environment,  and  moulding  themselves 
to achieve their  objectives in that environment . Even in academic research, there seems to 
have  been  no  attempt  to  present  a  practical  tool  that  can  be  used  as  a  source  of  strategic 
information.  A  combined  strategic  cost  management  model  could  address  this  gap  by 
providing information for strategic decisions.  
 
 Sources of strategic information in healthcare organizations  
Some  studies  have  looked  at  the  sources  of  strategic  information  and  strategy  formulation 
in  healthcare. The strategic  use  of  data  from  formal  sources  (such  as  circulated  reports, 
information  from  experts,  journal  and  magazine  articles)  and  informal  sources  (based  on 
experience, knowledge of operations, informal discussions etc.) in a health organization.  
 
They conclude  that  “formal  data  should  be  limited,  concise,  and  structured”.  A  combined 
strategic  cost  model  that  uses  the  BSC  framework  could  provide  such  specific,  structured 
information for strategic decisions.  
 
An  example  of  a  tool  for  strategic  planning using  a  strategic  information  systems  approach, 
and discuss the importance of incorporating internal and external analyses, and stakeholder
Page 21 of 37 
 
 
influences  into  the  development  of  a  strategic  information  system.  Here  again,  a  combined 
model  that  utilizes  the different  activity  dimensions  from  the  BSC  approach  could  address 
the need for strategic information from different perspectives.  
 
The importance of managing patients’ education costs strategically  
This  section  begins  by  discussing  the  role  of  costing  in healthcare,  followed  by  the 
importance  of  patient  education,  and  the  extant  literature  about  the  costs  of  patient 
education.  As  the  combined  model  is  developed  using  ABC  and  BSC,  and  is  then  applied  to 
patient  education,  the  applicability  of  each  of  these methods  to  healthcare  and  patient 
education forms the final part of the discussion.  
 
The role of costing in the healthcare sector  
 An  argument  can  be  made  that  the  strategic  objectives  of  healthcare  organizations, 
specifically  patient  education  programs,  are  related  to  changing  attitudes  and  lifestyles  of 
clients,  rather  than  to  cost  containment.  Though  this  may  be  true,  resource  optimization  is 
still  a  valid  goal  given  the  increasing  pressure  of  resource  scarcity  in  most  healthcare 
systems. Detailed  information  about  the  components  and  drivers  of  relevant  costs  could 
guide  decisions  that  improve  operational  efficiency,  through  improved  cost  management, 
efficiency  in  resource  utilization  and  better  resource  allocation  that  is  in  line  with  non-cost 
related strategic  objectives  of  a  health  program  or  service.  In  other  words,  while  cost 
reduction  may  not  be  a  primary  goal,  cost  management  can  make  resources  available  to 
meet strategic needs of healthcare organizations.  
 
Some  scholars  have  called  for  more  research  into  the  use  of  cost  information  for  decision 
making in healthcare. Researchers have commented on the absence of evidence-based cost 
containment  research  that  hospital  managers  can  use  in  their  decisions.  Their  three-stage 
cost  containment  framework  identifies  possible  avenues  of  healthcare  costing  research. 
These  include  (i)  the cost  measurement aspect  (such  as  the  cost  of  services,  types  of 
information currently available, differences in systems across organizations), (ii) the cost
Page 22 of 37 
 
 
control aspect  (such  as  effective  cost  control  strategies,  conditions  leading  to  selection  of 
one cost control strategy over another, non-financial impact of cost control efforts), and (iii) 
the assessment  of  value aspect  (such  as  the  impact  of  cost  control  on  quality  of  services, 
value addition to healthcare organizations and society).  
 
  
A combined  ABC/BSC  model  could  address  issues  from  all  three  stages  of  strategic  cost 
containment  in  healthcare.  A  combined  model  could  use  the  ABC  approach  to  identify  the 
costs of processes. Strategic activity dimensions would be provided by the BSC aspect of the 
model,  and  costs could  therefore  be  measured  for  these  dimensions  as  well.  While  ABC  on 
its own could address the cost measurement aspect, the added strategic focus of the BSC is 
needed  to  address  questions  in  the  other  two  areas  (cost  management  and  assessment  of 
value), which  link  costs  to  strategy  achievement.  As  discussed  earlier,  ABC  does  not  create 
this explicit link to strategy and so, as a strategic tool, a combined ABC/BSC model would be 
more useful than a traditional ABC model.
Page 23 of 37 
 
 
COST MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY 
The  Construction  activity  which,  inter  alia  includes  building  /  re-building  /  restoring 
structures  or  infrastructure  facilities,  typically  using  civil,  mechanical  or  other  branches  of 
engineering, plays an important role in the development of the economy as it has multiplier 
effect across various sectors creating investment opportunities. 
The  construction  industry  contributes  a  significant  share  of  the  country’s  GDP  and 
employment. 
 
Features of a construction contract / project are as follows: 
• Execution of projects as a contractor / sub-contractor or as a developer. 
• Projects involving design, detailed engineering,  procurement, manufacturing / fabrication, 
installation, commissioning. 
• The contracts / projects are  finalised  normally through a bidding process and the projects 
are executed as per client’s requirements at client’s project site. 
• The client normally makes payment based on the progress of work as per the contract. 
•  Contracts  also  normally  stipulate  work  /  quality  certification  by  a  client  nominated  third 
party consultant. 
•  Contracts  also  lay  down  performance  guarantee  conditions,  warranty  /  defect  liability 
period,  liquidated  damages  for  schedule  delay,  price  variation  clause  if  any,  client’s 
obligations  during  construction  period,  method  to  be  followed  for  any  change  in  scope  of 
work, claim management, force-majeure clause, arbitration etc. 
•  The  duration  of  a  project  may  vary  from  project  to  project  for  different  industries. 
Normally  the  projects  are  of  long  duration  (more  than  12  months)  and  revenue  is 
recognised generally based on Accounting Standard (AS-7) notified by Government of India, 
Ministry of Corporate Affairs. 
 
The major areas / projects where the construction industry is active may be as follows: 
(I) civil aviation project, 
(II) Ports,
Page 24 of 37 
 
 
(III) Environment, 
(IV) Oil & Gas, 
(V) Power, 
(VI) Roads, 
 (VII) Railways, 
(VIII) Rapid Mass Transport System, 
(IX) Urban Infrastructure, 
(X) Water Supply, 
(XI) River Linking Projects, 
(XII) Sewerage Projects 
(XIII) Solid Waste Management Projects 
(XIV) Roads, Bridges, Flyover 
(XV) Housing, Land and Township Infrastructure Development, 
(XVI) Air-Taxi Project, etc 
(XVII)  Development  of  Industrial  Land  including  Special  Economic  Zones.  The  categories 
under which the Constructions Industry may be operating are: 
• Construction involving civil and heavy engineering 
• Real estate and Property development 
• Construction projects involving specialty trades 
 
Few examples of above categories are as under: 
 Construction involving civil and heavy engineering 
 Industrial and mining infrastructure 
 Highways, roads, ports, railways, airports etc. 
 Rapid Mass Transport System, 
 Water Supply, 
 Bulk Material Handling 
 River Linking Projects, 
 Sewerage,
Page 25 of 37 
 
 
 Solid Waste Management 
 Power systems 
 Irrigation and agriculture systems 
 Telecommunication system 
 Real estate and Property development 
 Commercial real estate 
 Housing, schools, hospitals, Land and Township Infrastructure Development, 
 Construction projects involving specialty trades 
 Refineries, Chemical  plants,  Fertilizer  plants  including  complex  and  heavy process 
plant equipment 
 Oil and Gas projects including fabrication of Process Platforms, construction 
 of sub-sea and other pipelines 
 Floating systems 
 Power projects 
 Nuclear Power Plant Construction 
 Transmission and distribution lines 
 Electrical construction Project Models 
Public Private Partnership (PPP) Model 
Project under PPP arrangement, i.e. development, financing, constructing, maintenance and 
operation, are implemented for the Project Term by a Private / Public Sector Company to be 
selected by the Government or a statutory entity. 
 
The PPP Projects are usually in the following sectors: 
• Roads and bridges, railways, seaports, airports, inland waterways, hotels; 
• Power generation, transmission etc.; 
•  Urban  transport,  water  supply,  sewerage,  solid  waste  management  and  other physical 
infrastructure in urban areas; 
• =nfrastructure projects in Special Economic Zones
Page 26 of 37 
 
 
PPP Projects normally operate on the following basis: 
• BOT - Build, Operate and Transfer 
• BOOT - Build, Own, Operate and Transfer 
• BLOT - Build, Lease, Operate and Transfer 
• EPC - Engineering, Procurement and Construction. 
• DBFOT - Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer 
Real Estate Development Model 
The  term  real  estate is  essentially  used  in  connection  with  development  of  land  and 
construction/development of everything that is permanently attached to the land. 
These  permanent  fixtures  to  the  land  include  buildings,  fencing  to  the  buildings  and other 
fixtures such as plumbing, heating and lighting appliances. 
Real  estate  development  is  the  act  of  purchasing  land,  real  estate, and  making 
improvements to the land and / or existing buildings on it and / or new construction - 
 Either by themselves or by contractors and selling the property after development. 
 Developers purchase the land / real estate from Government / existing owner. 
 
Some commonly used models of Real estate development are: 
• Green field development (Traditional model) 
• Redevelopment model 
 
Examples of Real estate development projects are: 
• :ousing, Land and Township =nfrastructure Development 
• Development of commercial real estate 
• Development of Corporate =T parks 
 
EPC Contracting Model 
The  Developer  of  a  project  (either  Govt  or  Private Player under  PPP model)  delegates a 
portion  of  the  contract  to  an  EPC  (Engineering,  Procurement  and  Construction, including 
installation, commissioning etc. wherever applicable) Contractor. These contracts are
Page 27 of 37 
 
 
finalised  normally  through  a  technical  and  commercial  bidding process and  the  projects  are 
executed as per client’s requirements at the project site. 
 
Examples of commonly used models of EPC contracts are: 
• LSTK- Lump sum turnkey contracts 
• Cost plus contracts 
• =tem Rate Contract 
• A Combination of above 
 
The  EPC Contracting  model  is  used  by  every  contractor  or  sub-contractor  for executing  a 
construction contract awarded either by Govt. or Private Player under PPP model. 
 
Construction involving in-house fabrication or manufacturing 
Companies,  as  Developer  or  Contractor  may  have  in-house facilities  for  undertaking  long 
duration  (more  than  12  months)  manufacturing  / fabrication  of  equipment  /  structures  for 
use in the main construction project. 
 
These  equipment  /  structures  are  manufactured  /  fabricated  as  per  client’s  design, 
specification  and  other  requirements,  which  are  unique  for  each  contract.  Materials are 
either procured by the Company or provided by the Client based on the terms of contract. 
 
The  business  model  generally  involves  engineering,  procurement,  manufacturing  / 
fabrication,  transportation  to  project  site  and  installation  /  commissioning  in  the main 
construction project. 
 
Examples of in-house fabrication or manufacturing used for construction projects are: 
 
• Cement concrete slabs, beams, columns etc. for infrastructure projects 
• Reactors for Chemical Plants
Page 28 of 37 
 
 
• :eat exchangers for Fertilizer Plants 
• Process platforms for Oil & Gas exploration projects 
• Transmission towers for power transmission line projects Maintenance of Cost Accounting 
records by the Construction Industry. 
 
The  Rules  have  prescribed  that  cost  accounting  records  are  required  to  be maintained  in 
accordance  with  the  "generally  accepted  cost  accounting  principles" and  the  "cost 
accounting  standards"  issued  by  the  Institute  of  Cost  Accountants  of India  to  the  extent 
these  are  relevant  and  applicable.  The  rules  do  not  prescribe  any specific  format  of  cost 
statement and the company is free to adopt a system suitable to provide cost information. 
 
There cannot be any exhaustive list of cost records that are required to  be maintained. This 
would  depend  on  the  particular  situation,  structure  of  the  company and  the  activities  that 
the company  is engaged in.  What  is intended  is to ensure maintenance of such records and 
details  in  a  structured  manner  on  a  regular  basis  so that  the  accumulation  is  possible  on  a 
periodical  basis  to  arrive  at  the  cost  of  a particular  cost  object.  Such  analysis  of  individual 
cost components and relating it to the activity for which the same is incurred would help the 
company in taking proper management decisions. 
 
It  should  be  kept  in  mind  that  in  a  manufacturing  organisation,  the  operations include 
certain repetitive processes resulting in a particular “product” that can be measured in finite 
manner.  In  a  construction activity,  each  project  or  operation  can be  different  and  distinct 
and there is a need to define the “cost object” in relation to which the costs are required to 
be accumulated and reported. 
 
Reference  is  also  drawn  to  the  product  group  classification  notified  by  the  Ministry  of 
Corporate  Affairs  where  the  construction  industry  has  been  classified  under  the following 
service groups:
Page 29 of 37 
 
 
a) Construction of residential buildings 
b) Construction of non-residential buildings 
c) Construction of highways, road, bridges etc. 
d) Construction of industrial and non industrial plants, structures and facilities 
e) Laying of pipelines, communication and power lines 
f) Other construction activities not elsewhere specified 
g) Real estate development activities 
h) Architectural and engineering services 
i) Construction and Real Estate Related Services 
 
Exemption  from  applicability  of  Companies  (Cost  Accounting  Records)  Rules  2011,  to the 
construction Industry: 
 Companies  engaged  in  construction  business  as  contractors  or subcontractors 
wherein  they  are  paid  only  the  conversion  charges  (MCA  Circular No.  F.  No. 
52/1/CAB-2012 dated 25th May 2012); 
 Joint  Ventures  that  are  non-corporate  entities  [i.e.  not  companies  registered under 
the Companies Act] or to unlisted companies that are below the specified threshold 
limits  or  to  a  body  corporate  governed  by  any  special  Act. (MCA  Circular  No  F.  No. 
52/1/CAB-2012 dated 25th May 2012); 
 Companies  which  have  not  commenced  their  business  are  exempt  for  maintenance 
of  cost  records  till  their  business operations  commence.  The  term  “commencement 
of business” is  to  be  read  in  context  of  section  149  of  the  Companies  Act  1956.  In 
case  of a  manufacturing  company,  commencement  of  commercial  operation  means 
the  plant has  been  commissioned  on  a  commercial  scale.  In  other  context, 
commencement  of business  operations  is  to  be  read  as  defined  under  the  above 
section.
Page 30 of 37 
 
 
Applicability of CARR for various construction projects modals is given below: 
• PPP model: 
The primary business model is Build, Operate and Transfer. CARR will be applicable from the 
time  the  Company  starts  building  or  constructing  the  project (either  by  themselves  or 
through contractor). 
 
• EPC Contracting Model 
The business model is primarily Engineering, Procurement and Construction. 
CARR will be applicable from the initial stage of Engineering or construction, as applicable. 
 
• Real Estate Development Model 
The business model is primarily development and sale of real estate. CARR will be applicable 
from the start of development /construction activity. 
 
 These  rules  will  not  apply  to  construction  activity  which  is  not  meant  for  sale  or  for 
commercial  use.  For  example,  a  company  not  engaged  in  construction  business,  but 
constructing  staff  quarters  for  its  employees  or  erecting  manufacturing  plant,  will  not be 
covered  under  the  maintenance  of  CARR  relating  to  Construction  activity.  Such companies 
shall  be  covered  for  the  maintenance  of  cost  records  as  and  when company  commences 
commercial production.  
 
Nature of cost accounting records for construction activity 
Companies are to maintain books of accounts as per section 209 of the Companies Act 1956, 
including  cost  accounting  records  on  going  concern  basis.  Therefore  even  if a  company  has 
not  commenced  any  project  or  activity,  still  records  are  required  to  be maintained.  The 
broad  elements  of  cost  /  activities  for  which  detailed  cost  records are  required  to  be 
maintained  are  direct  material,  direct  labour,  direct  expenses  like certification  cost, 
subcontracting charges and so on, utilities, major items of overhead expenses, depreciation, 
royalty / technical know-how, interest and other borrowing costs, captive consumption, self
Page 31 of 37 
 
 
manufactured  products,  inter-company transactions  etc.  In  case  of  companies  engaged  in 
manufacturing or production of items for self consumption then: 
 
(a) Valuation of product which are covered under CETA, shall be in accordance with 
Central  Excise  Valuation  (Determination  of  Price  of  Excisable  Goods)  Rules,  2000 read  with 
CAS-4  (Cost  Accounting  Standard  on  Cost of  Production  for  Captive Consumption),  wherein 
valuation  is  to  be  based  on  cost  of  production  plus  10% margin  for  determining  the 
assessable value under the above rules. 
 
(b)  For  determining  the  value  of  inter-unit  transfer  of  items  for  captive consumption 
whether excisable or not, the value shall be only at cost of production. 
 
(c)  Detailed  records  for  other  elements  like  research  and  development  cost,  quality control 
cost, pollution control cost etc. shall be captured, if material. 
 
Cost Object 
The Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011 requires records to be kept on regular 
basis  in  such  manner  so  as  to  make  it  possible  to  calculate  per  unit  cost  of production  or 
cost  of  operations,  cost  of  sales  and  margin  for  each  of  its  products and activities  for  every 
financial year on monthly/quarterly/half-yearly/annual basis. 
 
Hence,  it  is  necessary  to  define  cost  object  in  relation  to  a  construction  activity.  In  a 
manufacturing  activity,  there  is  a  well  defined  product  that  emanates  out  of  the 
manufacturing/production  process  which  is  uniform  across  the  product  range  of  that 
product.  In  case  of  construction  activity,  each  activity  and  sub-activity  involved  in  the 
process  of  attaining  the  final  output  is  unique  and  the  final  output  would  also  be different 
from one to the other.
Page 32 of 37 
 
 
For example: 
(A) A  company  engaged  in  construction  of  residential  flats  may  have  different  types of 
flats  in  the  same  building,  and  in  blocks  of  flats,  the  buildings  containing  those flats 
may  be  different  in  structure  and  construction.  The  Project  in  the  context  of 
construction  activity  is  to  be  considered  as  the  cost  object.  A  company  is 
constructing 3 residential projects A, B & C in 3 different places. 
 
Project A consists of 3 buildings, Project B  consists of 5 buildings and Project C consists of  2 
buildings each of such building containing different types of flats. 
 
The  company  is  also  engaged  in  Project  D  which  is  construction  of  a  15  KM stretch  of  road 
which  also  includes  a  Bridge.  Project  E  of  the  company  is construction  and  erection  of  a 
Power  Plant. The  company  has  received  the  contract  of  road  and  bridge  construction  as  2 
separate projects (say Projects D1 and D2). 
 
For  maintenance  of  cost  accounting  records,  the  company  would  be  required  to maintain 
specified  records  in  respect  of  Projects  A,  B,  C,  D1,  D2  and  E  as it’s distinct  and  individual 
cost  objects.  Detailed  cost  records  are  also  to  be  maintained  for  each  sub  cost  centre  /  sub 
project.  These  records  are  also  used  for  internal  reporting  (MIS)  and  decision  making 
process as these are useful for determining the cost of project / activity separately. 
 
Methodology 
Project Costing Methodology 
 
Once  a  project  is  awarded  based  on  Technical  /  Commercial  /  Price  evaluation,  a distinct 
project  number  is  allotted  for  each project  and  the  same  can  be  in  the  form of  Work 
Breakdown  Structure  (WBS)  or  Sub-project  numbers  etc.  All  costs  incurred for  the  project 
should be captured against its WBS number / cost object / Sub-project number. All common 
functions like Quality Control, HR, Finance & Accounts, Legal, Secretarial etc. is to be
Page 33 of 37 
 
 
identified  by  separate  cost centre codes  and  all  costs  relating to  such  functions  is  to  be 
assigned to respective cost centres. These costs are to be absorbed by the projects by use of 
appropriate recovery mechanism. 
 
Variances  between  budgeted  and  actual  costs  are  to  be  reviewed  at  periodic  intervals and 
necessary corrective actions / adjustments are to be carried out. 
 
Usage cost of common pool of Plant & Machinery: 
Construction  companies  typically  use  fixed  assets  like  cranes,  crushing  equipments, etc. 
which are used over multiple projects. All such common assets can be under the control of a 
separate department with the objective of improving the utilization and productivity of such 
plant  and  machinery  and  the  resultant  operating  efficiency  of  the projects.  All  costs  (like 
salaries  &  wages  of  department  and  operating  staff,  fuels, consumables,  repairs  & 
maintenance,  consumable  spares,  insurance,  depreciation, specific  interest  cost  etc.) 
relating  to  such  plant  and  machineries  are  to  be accumulated  in  distinct  cost  centre  codes 
and an internal hire rate for different types of machinery can be worked out considering the 
normal utilization of such assets. 
 
Projects  using  such  assets  are to  be charged  based  on  utilization  at  the  agreed internal  hire 
rate. Any under / over recovery of cost of this department is to be periodically reviewed and 
necessary corrective actions / adjustments are to be carried out. 
 
Revenue Recognition 
Construction  industry  maintains  its  accounts  and  recognises  revenue  on  the  basis  of 
Accounting  Standard - 7.  The  revenue  recognition  for  cost  accounting  records  would follow 
the  same  principle.  The  elements  of  costs  and  revenue  would  be  based  on  the same 
principles as adopted for its financial accounting.
Page 34 of 37 
 
 
Cost statements would be prepared in respect of individual projects as explained above. For 
continuing  projects,  the  costs  would  represent  the  amount  of  expenses pertaining  to  the 
project as considered in its financial profit and loss account. 
Similarly,  the  corresponding  revenue  recognized  for  the  project  during  the  financial period 
would be considered for arriving at the margin as per cost accounts. 
 
Expenses,  which  are  classified  as  non-cost  items  as  per  the  generally  accepted  cost 
accounting  principles  and  cost  accounting  standards  should  not  be  considered  as  a part  of 
cost and  should  be  considered  as  a  charge  in  the  costing  profit  and  loss account 
(reconciliation statement between cost accounts and financial accounts). 
 
In  respect  of  large  companies  engaged  in  various  different  construction  projects,  the 
administrative  overheads  and  corporate  expenses  are  not  allocated  to  individual project 
accounts. However, for cost accounting  records and to arrive at the true project costs, such 
overheads should be apportioned to individual projects on a suitable basis. 
 
Interest  and financing charges,  not  directly  related  or  identified  with  a  particular project 
should be apportioned to the projects on a suitable basis.  
 
Rules 4(3)  of  the  CARR  2011  provides  that  the  cost  records  shall  be  maintained  in 
accordance  with  the  generally  accepted  cost  accounting  principles  and  cost  accounting 
standards  issued  by  the  Institute;  to  the  extent  these  are  found  to  be  relevant  and 
applicable. The variations, if any, shall be clearly indicated and explained. 
 
The  Institute  has  notified  the  Generally  Accepted  Cost  Accounting  Principles  (GACAP) in 
November  2011.  GACAP  is  compilation  of  Cost  Accounting  Principles  currently  being 
followed  in  India.  It  has  also  incorporated  the  principles  contained  in  the  Cost Accounting 
Standards (CAS) issued by the Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) of the Institute.
Page 35 of 37 
 
 
The  applicability  and  relevance  of  the  GACAP  and  CASs  to  the construction  industry  is 
discussed below.  
 
Each contract  /  sub-contract  is  a  cost  object  and  costs  are  to  be  captured  contract wise. 
Since each contract is a heterogeneous, job costing system is applicable. 
 
In  construction  industry  /  real  estate  development  activity  jobs  are  executed  on contract  / 
project  basis.  Each  contract  /  project  is  a  separate  cost  object.  Accounts  are being 
maintained  by  the  construction  industry  in  compliance  with  the  provisions  of relevant 
Accounting  Standards.  Costs  are  accumulated  for  each  contract  /  project which  is  regarded 
as a separate activity for cost determination and control. Most of the expenses incurred are 
of  the  nature  of  direct  expenses.  The  indirect  expenses mainly  consist  of  office  and 
administration  costs,  expenses  relating  to  repair, workshop,  expenses  of  stores  /  store 
yards, cost of special  plant and equipment and architect’s fee etc. The depreciation  of plant 
and machinery deployed at site is debited to Contract. 
 
 Applicability of CAS: 
 
Cost Accounting Standards have been issued and their applicability is discussed as under: 
 
CAS  1 (Classification  of  Cost  Applicable) - To  be  applied  for  proper  classification  and 
assessment  of  cost  of  a  cost  object  and  for  preparation  of Cost Statements  on  consistent 
and uniform basis. 
 
CAS 2 (Capacity Determination) - Not Applicable for construction activity. 
 
CAS  3 (Overheads) - Equally  apply  to  Construction  activities.  Overhead expenses  are  to  be 
classified as  Site  /  Works  /  Construction Overheads,  Administrative Overheads.  Selling 
Overheads or any other classification as may be applicable. For control purposes, the
Page 36 of 37 
 
 
Overheads  are  to  be  classified  as Fixed,  Variable  or  Semi  Variable,  keeping  in  mind  the 
nature  and  purpose  of  the  cost.  Absorption  of  overheads  is to be  done  on  suitable  / 
rationale basis viz. estimate of efforts involved etc. 
 
CAS 4 (Cost of Production for Captive Consumption) -Applicable to the extent relevant 
CAS 5 (Average (equalized) Cost of Transportation) - Applicable to the extent relevant 
CAS 6 (Material  Cost  Applicable  for  measurement  /  assignment  of  material  cost)- 
Quantitative  details  to  be  kept  as  practice  in  the  industry and  materiality  of  the  material 
cost. 
CAS 7 (Employee Cost) - Applicable for measurement / assignment of employee 
Cost 
CAS 8 (Cost of Utilities) - Applicable to the extent relevant 
CAS 9(Packing Material)- Cost Not applicable 
CAS 10 (Direct Expenses) - Applicable 
CAS 11 (Administrative Overheads) - Applicable to the extent relevant 
CAS 12 (Repair& Maintenance Cost) - Applicable to the extent relevant 
CAS 13 (Service Cost Centre) - Applicable to the extent relevant 
CAS 14 (Pollution Control Cost) - Applicable to the extent relevant 
As stated  earlier,  the  companies  in  the  construction  industry  are  already  maintaining  the 
records as per Accounting Standard (AS-7) or cost records as per their MIS requirements. To 
have uniformity and consistency in the treatment of various elements of cost, it is desirable 
that companies shall lay down a cost accounting policy to cover the following areas: 
a) Identification of cost centres / cost objects (projects) and cost drivers. 
b)  Accounting  for  material  cost,  stores  at  store  yards,  employee  cost,  and  other  relevant 
cost components. 
c) Accounting, allocation and absorption of Overheads 
d)  Accounting  for  Depreciation  /  Amortization,  Transfer  in  and  transfer  out  of  equipment 
from the site. 
e) Accounting for scarps, wastage etc.
Page 37 of 37 
 
 
f) Basis for Inventory Valuation 
g) Methodology for valuation of Inter-Unit / Inter Company and Related Party transactions. 
h)  Treatment  of  abnormal  and  non-recurring  costs  including  classification  of  other  non-cost 
items. 
 
The policy shall be adopted for determining the cost of the project. 
 
 
About ISMA 
Indian Society of Management Accountants is association of CMA professionals representing leading 
strategic  management  accounting  professionals  of  India  who  integrate  accounting  expertise  with 
advanced  management  skills  to  achieve  business  success. CMAs  are  capable  of  assuming  strategic 
leadership  and  management  roles  in  a  broad  range  of  business  functions,  adding  value  to  an 
organization, enhancing its competitiveness and maximizing shareholders’ value. 
www.cmaonline.in 
    
About BIMTECH 
Birla  Institute  of  Management  Technology  was  established  in  1988  under  the  aegis  of  the  Birla 
Academy  of  Art  and  Culture,  and  supported  by  Birla  group  of  companies.  Dr.  (Smt.)  Sarala  Birla, 
chairperson of Birla Academy and Syt. B K Birla, chairperson of B K Birla Group of companies are the 
founders  of  the  business  school.  The  Board  of  Governors  is  comprised  of  eminent  people  from 
industry  and  headed  by  Smt  Jayashree  Mohta,  Vice  Chairperson,  Birla  Academy  of  Art  &  Culture, 
Kolkata. 
www.bimtech.ac.in 
 
Copyright 2016 ISMA 
 
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular 
individual or entity.  There can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will 
continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after 
a thorough examination of the particular situation and we will not be responsible in any circumstances, whatsoever.