Easy Office

Countervailing/Anti-subsidy investigation on the imports of Clear Float Glass originating in or exported from Malaysia

Last updated: 31 December 2020

 Notice Date : 29 December 2020

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Department of Commerce)
(DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRADE REMEDIES)
NOTIFICATION
(Final Findings)
New Delhi, the 29th December, 2020
(CASE No. CVD 04/2019)

Subject : Countervailing/Anti-subsidy investigation on the imports of Clear Float Glass originating in or exported from Malaysia.

A. BACKGROUND

1. F. No.6/14/2019-DGTR- Having regard to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as amended from time to time (hereinafter also referred to as the Act), and Rule 18 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Countervailing Duty on Subsidized Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, as amended from time to time, (hereinafter also referred to as the “Rules” or the “Countervailing Duty/ CVD Rules”) thereof:

2. Whereas, M/s Asahi India Glass Ltd., M/s Gold Plus Glass Industry Ltd., M/s Saint-Gobain Glass India Ltd. and M/s Sisecam Flat Glass India Ltd. (hereinafter also referred to as “the Applicants” had filed an application before the Designated Authority (hereinafter also referred to as “the Authority”) in accordance with the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as amended from time to time (hereinafter also referred to as ―the Act”) and the Countervailing Duty Rules, as amended from time to time for imposition of countervailing/anti-subsidy duty on imports of ―Clear Float Glass” (hereinafter also referred to as ―subject goods”) originating in or exported from Malaysia (hereinafter also referred to as the ―subject country”).

3. And, Whereas, the Authority, on the basis of sufficient evidence submitted by the applicant, issued a Notification No. 6/14/2019-DGTR dated 1.10.2019, published in the Gazette of India, initiating the subject investigation in accordance with Rule 5 of the above Rules to determine existence, degree and effect of the alleged subsidy of the subject goods, originating in or exported from Malaysia, and to recommend the amount of anti-subsidy duty, which, if levied, would be adequate to remove the alleged injury to the domestic industry.

Please refer to the attached file for details

 




Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link