When nither proof in support of claim can be requisitioned nor expenditure can be judged it is not possible ti interfere with the finding of the CIT


Last updated: 18 July 2012

Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Brief :
Capital expenditure debited to P&L account: In the Tax Audit Report, the auditor has identified the amount as capital expenditure. The details of the same have been furnished in the Annexure 1 to the Audit Report. Accordingly, the same was clearly disallowable u/s 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. Since the items constituting the said amount have not been shown as bad debts, as claimed by you in the application, there was no occasion to consider the same as such within the scope of the provision of section 143(1)(a) of the Act

Citation :
Assistant CIT, Central Ci rcle- 6, Room no.334, ARA Centre,Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi (Appellant)Vs. M/s Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd. , 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj,Lucknow (U.P.) [PAN: 19-222-CN-1280] (Respondent)

You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :

GST Plus

Stay updated! Stay ads free

Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.

CCI PRO annual subscription :

Original Price : INR 2999/-

Offer Price : INR 1999/-

Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)


Know More

Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
 

CCI Pro

CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1703

Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members


Follow us
budget 26-27