Refund on Extra Duty Deposit should be automatic under the Customs Act


Quick Summary
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad has ruled that importers are entitled to an automatic refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) without needing to file a separate application under Section 27 of the Customs Act. This decision clarifies that EDD paid during provisional assessment is essentially a security deposit, not a final duty payment. Therefore, claims for its refund should not be time-barred.

Court :
CESTAT, Ahmedabad

Brief :
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of M/s China Steel Corporation India Pvt Ltd v. C.C.-Ahmedabad [Final Order No. A/ 10817 /2022 dated July 26,2022] has held that the assessee would be entitle to automatic refund of Extra Duty Deposit ("the EDD") without filing of application for refund under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 ("the Customs Act").

Citation :
Final Order No. A/ 10817 /2022 dated July 26,2022

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of M/s China Steel Corporation India Pvt Ltd v. C.C.-Ahmedabad [Final Order No. A/ 10817 /2022 dated July 26,2022] has held that the assessee would be entitle to automatic refund of Extra Duty Deposit ("the EDD") without filing of application for refund under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 ("the Customs Act").

Facts

M/s China Steel Corporation India Pvt Ltd ("the Appellant") has engaged in import of Silicon Electrical Steel of Cold Rolled Full Hard ("the Goods") from a related entity. The issue of valuation was taken up by the Special Valuation Brance("the SVB"). EDD of 1% is to be provided as a safeguard for revenue and accordingly the Appellant had deposited EDD. The assessment was finally approved and EDD was paid by the Appellant and became refundable to them. The order accepting the declared value was passed on February 04, 2016 and refund claim was filed on January 24 , 2018. The Show Cause Notice ("the SCN") was issued seeking to reject refund claim on the grounds of limitation. Aggrieved by such rejection, the Appellant filed the present appeal.

Appellant's Contention

  • Such rejection was non-speaking and passed without application of mind.
  • The duty was paid during the provisional assessment of the bills of entries, is only a security deposit and not a payment of duty and hence, Section 27 of the Customs Act is not applicable.
  • The decision of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Bussa Overseas and Properties Pvt. Ltd [2003 (158) E.L.T. 135 dated September 15, 2003("the BussaOverseas") cannot be relied in the instant case, as the facts are totally different and also entitled to interest on delayed payment of refund of EDD.

Respondent's Contention

  • The assessment in the instant case was provisional till the same was finalised after the report of SVB was received. The assessment was finalized on receipt of the report of SVB.
  • The decision of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Bussa's Overseas, the provision under Section 27 of the Customs Act are attracted.

Issue

  • Whether the Appellant is entitled to get refund of EDD paid by them during the assessment period?

Held

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in Final Order No. A/ 10817 /2022 dated July 26, 2022 has held as under:

  • The decision of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Bussa Overseas was passed in significantly on different set of facts.
  • Relied upon the judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the matter of Commissioner of Customs Chennai v. Sayonara Exports 2015 [2015 (321) E.L.T. 583 dated March 6, 2015]wherein the decision was held in favour of the assessee and held that the Appellant would be entitled to automatic refund of EDD without filing of application for refund under Section 27 of the Customs Act.
  • Further, held that, the Appellant was not even required to file refund claim and EDD should have been refunded without filing of refund claim and when the refund claim was filed by the Appellant, it cannot be treated as barred by limitation.

FAQ :

Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) is a sum paid by an importer as a safeguard for revenue, often during provisional assessment of goods.

No, according to the CESTAT ruling, the refund of EDD should be automatic and does not require a separate application under Section 27 of the Customs Act.

The CESTAT held that EDD is a security deposit, not a duty payment, and therefore, refund claims should not be treated as barred by limitation.

The ruling was made by the CESTAT (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal), Ahmedabad.

The case involved the import of Silicon Electrical Steel of Cold Rolled Full Hard.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in Accounts
Views : 811

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
21 August 2026
Accountant

A G International

Kolkata

B.Com

View Details
Company
21 August 2026
Finance Manager

Resollect Technologies Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 August 2026
Article Assistant

Jain Ankit and Co

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 August 2026
Article Assistant

M/s.S.G.Salecha & Co.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 August 2026
Article Assistant

RRPM & ASSOCIATES LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Velionit Consulting PVT LTd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
19 August 2026
Chartered Accountant - Financial Consolidation & Reporting

Synergy Keystone

Mumbai

CA

View Details