Avail 20% discount on updated CA lectures for Dec 21 .Use Code RESULT20 !! Call : 088803-20003

ICICI

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Provisions of Section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961, towards share application money

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT Delhi

Brief :
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order dated 05.12.2016 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year: 2012-13.  

Citation :
I.T.A No.6081/Del/2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
 DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
 (Through Video Conferencing)

 BEFORE,
 SHRI R.K.PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
 AND
 SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

 I.T.A No.6081/Del/2017
 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2012-13)

SAS Hospitality Private
Limited
14D, 14th Floor
Hansalaya Building
Barakhamba Road
New Delhi- 110 001.
PAN–AAOCS 1815Q
(Appellant) 

Vs.

Income Tax Officer
Ward-22(3),
New Delhi
(Respondent)

Appellant By Sh. Kapil Goel, Adv.
Respondent by Shri Prakash Dubey, Sr. DR

Date of Hearing 25.03.2021
Date of Pronouncement 21.06.2021

ORDER

 PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM:

 This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order dated 05.12.2016 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year: 2012-13.  

2.0 The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

“1. The learned Income Tax Officer has erred in law as well as on fact, in making an addition of Rs.7,50,00,000/- under section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961, towards share application money.

2. The learned Income Tax Officer has erred in law as well as on fact, in making a disallowance of Rs.17,365/-, under section 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961.

3. The learned Income Tax Officer has erred in law as well as on fact, in making an addition of Rs.1,28,093/- under section 43B of the I.T. Act, 1961.

4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend, raise or delete any or all grounds of appeal.”

2.1 The assessee has also subsequently filed the revised grounds of appeal which are as under:

“1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (Appeals)-17, New Delhi, has erred in not providing sufficient opportunity to the appellant-Company of being heard.

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals)- 17, New Delhi, has erred in law as well as on fact, in confirming additions of Rs. 7,50,00,000/- made by AO u/s. 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961, towards share application money. 

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

Guest
on 02 July 2021
Published in Income Tax
Views : 39
downloaded 14 times
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags