PRATIKSHA J. KUDTARKAR, MUMBAI Vs. ITO - 26 (2)(4), MUMBAI
Last updated: 28 November 2020
Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
These two appeals by the assessee for Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2010-11, are directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, Mumbai (in short ‘the CIT(A)’) for the respective assessment years, confirming levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
Citation :
ITA NOS. 2673 & 2674/MUM/2019
You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :
Stay updated! Stay ads free
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Original Price : INR 2999/-
Offer Price : INR 1999/-
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Know More
Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 109
Comments
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
