Penalty under Section 171(3A) cannot be imposed retrospectively says NAA


Last updated: 07 September 2020

Court :
NAA (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Brief :
The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here­in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 03.04.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit in respect of the flat purchased by him in the "One Park Avenue" project of the Respondent on introduction of the GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017, as per the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017

Citation :
Petitioner / Applicant SH. RATISH NAIR Respondent M/S. MAN REALTY LTD

You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :

GST Plus

Stay updated! Stay ads free

Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.

CCI PRO annual subscription :

Original Price : INR 1999/-

Offer Price : INR 999/-

Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)


Know More

Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
 
Join CCI Pro

Guest
Published in GST
Views : 113



Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link