Patiala House Court denies bail to man charged with obtaining fraudulent ITC


Last updated: 06 September 2021

Court :
Patiala High Court

Brief :
In State vs. Yogesh Kumar Goyal [Bail Application No. 1676/21 dated August 31, 2021], Yogesh Kumar Goyal ("the Applicant") has filed the current bail application - against FIR No. DZU/INV/GST/A894/2021, made against him under Section 132 (1) (b) & (c) of The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST Act").

Citation :
Bail Application No. 1676/21 dated August 31, 2021

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in Income Tax
Views : 108
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. Supreme Court affirms the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act: No ITC to the recipient unless the supplier actually deposits tax to the Government
  2. No Addition under Income Tax Law on Bogus Purchases, Where Sales Are Accepted and Supplies Are Backed by GST Records and Banking Trail
  3. Voluntary Tax Payment Does Not Bar Proceedings Under Section 74 Where Suppression Allegation Remains Uncontested
  4. Appellate Authority Cannot Pass "Copy-Paste" Orders Without Independent Application of Mind
  5. Audit Closure Bars Reopening of Same Issues Under Section 73
  6. Big Relief ITC Cannot Be Denied to a Bona Fide Purchaser Merely Because the Supplier's Registration Cancelled Retrospectively
  7. ITC Cannot Be Denied Solely on the Ground that the Supplier was Subsequently Declared Non-Existent, Without Examining the Documentary Evidence Furnished by the Assessee
  8. GSTAT to Examine Whether Mandatory Pre-Deposit is Payable on Penalty Order Only Passed Prior to October 1, 2025
  9. No Further Pre-Deposit is Required Before the Appellate Tribunal Where the Amount Already Deposited Before the First Appellate Authority Exceeds the Specified Limit of Pre-Deposit Payable on the Reduced Demand
  10. Corporate Guarantee Without Consideration Not Taxable Under GST

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Krishnamohan GangarajuKrishnamohan GangarajuPro Member Credible HRMCredible HRMPro Member Jitin Aditya KapurJitin Aditya KapurPro Member SuhasiniSuhasiniPro Member Rakesh BansalRakesh Bansal
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Follow us
add to google news

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
CA Article

Pipara & Co. LLP.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 July 2026
Article internship

AJAY SINGH AND CO LLP

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Felicity Adobe LLP

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 18 July 2026
Senior Manager- Finance & Accounts

apricus india

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
11 July 2026
CA semi qualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 July 2026
Senior accountant

RJ Public School

Bengaluru

B.Com

View Details